Where can one access trial transcripts and forensic reports from Nuremberg and subsequent war crimes trials?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
The largest, most accessible single repository for the Nuremberg trial transcripts and evidentiary records is the Harvard Law School Library’s Nuremberg Trials Project, which now offers a fully searchable digital collection of more than 750,000 pages covering all 13 trials including most transcripts and prosecution exhibits [1] [2]. Multiple other institutional holdings and digitized collections — the U.S. National Archives (Record Group 238 and related microfilm), Cornell’s Donovan collection, the Library of Congress/Green Series, Stanford’s Virtual Tribunals, the Avalon Project and specialized archives such as the UNWCC/ICC Legal Tools — provide complementary transcripts, “Blue/Green” printed series, case files and other war‑crimes materials [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8].
1. Where to start online: Harvard’s complete digitisation
For immediate online access begin with Harvard Law School Library’s Nuremberg Trials Project: the site publishes digitized images, descriptive metadata and searchable full‑text for most prosecution exhibits and most trial transcripts from all thirteen trials, and the project claims the first complete, keyword‑searchable online collection totaling some 750,000+ pages [2] [1]. Reporting emphasizes the trove includes verbatim courtroom transcripts, lawyers’ documents and submitted evidence — material scholars previously had to consult in multiple archives [9] [10].
2. Official printed records and complementary online editions
The classic printed records remain essential: “The Blue Series” (official IMT proceedings) and the 15‑volume “Green Series” (Subsequent NMT trials) are available in libraries and in some digitized forms. Institutional holdings cited in the sources include Cornell’s Donovan Nuremberg Trials Collection (nearly 150 bound volumes, including the 42‑volume official English text), Lynn University’s set of the Blue Series, and various university and special‑collection digital reproductions [4] [11] [12].
3. U.S. government archives and microfilm — for prosecution and court papers
The U.S. National Archives maintains extensive war‑crimes records: Record Group 238 for IMT and U.S. military tribunals holds transcripts, exhibits, interrogations and document books; microfilm series such as M1217, T991, T992 and others reproduce trial briefs, interrogation records and documentary evidence [3] [5]. The National Archives’ guides and finding aids point researchers to the microfilm and digitized finding aids for particular series [13] [5].
4. Other institutional and international sources — breadth and special collections
Several other repositories hold unique or overlapping materials: the National Library of Medicine has mimeographed English transcripts and documentary evidence for the medical experiments trial (MS C 408) [14] [15]. The United Nations War Crimes Commission archive and its records have been added to the ICC Legal Tools Database, offering 2,240 UNWCC documents (22,184 pages) useful for pretrial and prosecutorial context [8] [16]. The Wiener Holocaust Library, British National Archives, Stanford’s Virtual Tribunals initiative and the Avalon Project at Yale each provide curated selections, trial indices, or digitized case files and contextual guides [12] [17] [6] [7].
5. What you will find — transcripts versus forensic/forensic‑style reports
Available sources confirm verbatim court transcripts, prosecution/defense exhibits, evidentiary document books and staff evidence analyses are widely available in these collections [2] [18] [3]. Specialized forensic reports — for example detailed medical‑forensic evidence for the Doctors’ Trial — appear within specific trial document sets (and are preserved in collections such as the NLM’s medical experiments records), but if you need a standalone modern “forensic report” format beyond the original trial evidence folders, available sources do not mention a centralized modern forensic‑reanalysis repository [14] [15].
6. Practical research strategy and caveats
Start at Harvard’s portal for full‑text searching and linked page images [1]. Use National Archives finding aids and microfilm numbers (RG 238, M1217, T991/T992, etc.) to retrieve U.S. government holdings and related microfilm [3] [5]. Consult specialized collections (Cornell Donovan, NLM, Wiener, Stanford) for unique volumes or medical/legal subcollections [4] [14] [12] [6]. Expect variation in formats, completeness and languages: many holdings include German originals, English translations, mimeographs and “Staff Evidence Analyses,” and some series (e.g., supplementary court papers) are incomplete in particular archives [14] [15].
7. Conflicting claims and transparency about completeness
Media coverage frames Harvard’s release as the first fully searchable, consolidated online corpus of all 13 trials outside U.S. National Archives holdings; Harvard itself notes its collection is among the most complete sets available and emphasizes discoverability through metadata work [1] [10]. Researchers should note that multiple archives still hold overlapping or unique items — the National Archives, UNWCC/ICC Legal Tools, Cornell’s Donovan papers, Stanford’s Virtual Tribunals and specialized libraries all retain material not duplicated everywhere [3] [8] [4] [6].
8. Next steps and assistance
If you want direct links, specific series numbers or help locating a particular transcript/witness/forensic exhibit, name the trial or exhibit and I will map where that item appears across Harvard, NARA, Cornell, NLM, the ICC Legal Tools and other repositories cited above [1] [3] [4] [14] [8].