Do illegal aliens commit more violent crime than citizens

Checked on February 5, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

A clear majority of recent, peer‑reviewed and government‑funded studies find that undocumented (commonly termed “illegal”) immigrants are less likely to be arrested for violent crimes than U.S.‑born citizens, and that increases in unauthorized migration have not been linked to rising violent crime at the state or metropolitan level [1] [2] [3]. Nonetheless, important caveats—differences in data sources, reliance on arrest rather than conviction records, and a small body of mixed findings for specific subgroups—mean the answer is evidence‑based but not absolute [4] [5].

1. The headline evidence: lower violent‑crime arrest rates for undocumented immigrants

Multiple high‑quality analyses report substantially lower rates of violent‑crime arrests among undocumented immigrants compared with native‑born citizens: Texas data used in a NIJ‑funded and PNAS study found undocumented people were arrested for violent felonies at less than half the rate of U.S.‑born residents (over two times higher for citizens) and similar patterns hold for drug and property offenses [1] [2] [6]. Broader reviews and syntheses, including Migration Policy and the immigration-council">American Immigration Council, summarize a growing consensus that immigrants—documented and undocumented—commit crimes at lower rates than the U.S.‑born population [3] [7].

2. Trends and macro‑analyses: unauthorized migration and violent crime are not positively correlated

Longitudinal, state‑level and national studies find little evidence that rising unauthorized populations drive violent‑crime increases; some research even ties larger immigrant concentrations to declines in violent and property crime [5] [8] [7]. Investigations covering decades and multiple jurisdictions report no consistent link between immigrant share and higher crime rates, and in many places violent crime has fallen while immigrant shares rose [7] [8].

3. Methodological limits that matter: arrests, geography, and data availability

The most detailed individual‑level comparisons come from Texas because its law enforcement records uniquely track immigration status at arrest, so much of the empirical weight rests on one jurisdiction’s administrative data [9] [6]. Most studies use arrest rates as a proxy for criminal conduct; arrests can reflect policing practices, reporting rates, and local enforcement priorities rather than identical underlying offending [2] [4]. Researchers repeatedly caution about generalizing beyond studied places and timeframes and note that homicide statistics fluctuate because murders are rare and often unsolved [10] [5].

4. Exceptions, nuances, and unsettled findings

Not every study is identical: some analyses suggest that unauthorized flows from particular source countries may have localized associations with violence, and a 2016 study (Green) flagged nuances for immigration from Mexico—though the broader literature finds no systematic increase in violent crime with unauthorized immigration [5]. Researchers also emphasize that age composition, socioeconomic context, and selection effects (first‑generation immigrants being less crime‑prone) likely explain much of the gap, but those mechanisms are not fully resolved [5] [4].

5. Politics, perception, and why the debate persists

Political narratives often treat migration as a criminal threat despite the weight of empirical evidence; advocacy groups and policy actors on both sides have incentives—policy expansion or restriction—to emphasize particular studies or anecdotes, which fuels public misperception [11] [8]. Independent watchdogs and nonpartisan research centers repeatedly argue that enforcement‑focused policies (e.g., deportation drives) have not clearly reduced violent crime, underscoring a possible mismatch between political claims and statistical reality [9] [8].

6. Bottom line

On balance of current, peer‑reviewed and government‑sponsored research, undocumented immigrants do not commit more violent crime than citizens; they are arrested for violent offenses at substantially lower rates in the best available datasets, and macro‑level studies find no positive linkage between unauthorized immigration and violent crime trends—while leaving open methodological caveats and rare, context‑specific exceptions [1] [2] [5].

Want to dive deeper?
How do arrest rates for undocumented immigrants compare to conviction and incarceration rates?
What methodological differences explain divergent findings about immigration and violent crime in different studies?
How have political narratives and media coverage affected public perception of immigrant crime rates?