Which European countries showed the largest change in rape convictions per reported rape from 2020 to 2023?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
There is no single dataset in the provided sources that lists "rape convictions per reported rape" by European country for 2020 and 2023, so a direct ranking or identification of the countries with the largest change is not available in current reporting (available sources do not mention a country-by-country convictions-per-report ratio for 2020–2023) [1] [2]. Eurostat and related EU reports show rising police-recorded sexual violence and stress that differences in definitions, reporting and recording practices make cross‑country comparisons unreliable [1] [3].
1. What the official records actually show — rising recorded sexual violence, not convictions ratios
Eurostat’s crime reporting and the European Commission’s Statistics Explained show that police-recorded sexual violence (including rape) rose across the EU between 2013 and 2023 and that 2023 continued that upward trend; these datasets document numbers of police-recorded offences but not a standardized convictions-per-report metric across countries for 2020–2023 [1] [4]. These publications explicitly warn that differences in national laws, recording practices and reporting levels distort cross‑country comparisons [1] [4].
2. Why “convictions per reported rape” is hard to measure and compare
The European Institute for Gender Equality and other EU analyses emphasise that comparable data would require consistent collection at each stage of the criminal justice process — from reports to police, to prosecutions and finally convictions — and that such continuous, harmonised indicators are not uniformly available across jurisdictions [3]. The Swedish and other reports used by researchers also underline that changes to legislation and recording methods (for example, moving to a consent‑based definition) materially change the number of reports, prosecutions and convictions and thus the apparent rates [5] [6].
3. Country examples that illustrate the problem — Sweden and England/Wales
Sweden is frequently cited for high reported rape rates but researchers and national bodies attribute much of that to broader legal definitions and recording practices, plus legislative change that increased reporting and court case types — one source notes conviction rates rose substantially after legislative reform [7] [6]. England and Wales record high counts of police-recorded rape but very low proportions proceed to prosecution or conviction; Wikipedia’s summary cites a large gap between recorded rapes and prosecutions in 2020, illustrating attrition in the justice pipeline rather than an outright “convictions per report” improvement or decline reported for 2020–2023 in the sources provided [8].
4. Evidence of conviction-rate shifts exists but is piecemeal, not pan‑European
Advocacy and national evaluations report local impacts of law changes: for example, assessments noted a 75% increase in convictions reported in analyses of Sweden’s move to an affirmative‑consent model — but that figure is tied to specific national reform and context and is not presented as part of a harmonised Europe‑wide table covering 2020–2023 [6]. Academic work on Sweden documents absolute conviction counts and warns about interpreting them without accounting for reporting and recording shifts [5] [9].
5. How to answer your question reliably — what’s missing and next steps
To identify which European countries showed the largest change in convictions per reported rape from 2020 to 2023 you would need: (a) police‑recorded rape reports by country for 2020 and 2023; (b) number of convictions for rape in the same years and jurisdictions; and (c) metadata showing whether legal definitions or recording rules changed across that interval. Eurostat offers police‑recorded offence totals but not harmonised convictions-per-report ratios, and the EIGE guidance stresses the need for continuous stage‑by‑stage data collection — those exact, comparable conviction‑per‑report series for 2020–2023 are not present in the provided reporting [1] [3].
6. Competing interpretations and hidden agendas to watch for
Different actors emphasise different facts: national authorities or advocacy groups may highlight increased convictions after legal reform as evidence of progress [6], while critics warn that rising reports can reflect better recording and victim support rather than prevalence change [1] [7]. Political actors sometimes link crime statistics to migration or social policy without accounting for definitional and reporting differences; fact‑checking outlets recommend caution and call for standardized victim surveys to reveal true prevalence [10].
7. Practical recommendation for verification
If you want a definitive answer, request — ideally from Eurostat or national criminal justice agencies — country‑level time series for police‑recorded rape reports in 2020 and 2023, prosecutions and convictions for equivalent offences in the same years, and metadata on any definitional or recording changes over the period. Eurostat’s crime statistics and EIGE methodological guidance are the correct starting points, but available public reporting in the supplied sources does not contain the harmonised convictions‑per‑report comparisons you asked for [1] [3].