How did camp personnel obtain, store, and deploy the homicidal chemicals?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Camp personnel obtained, stored and deployed homicidal gases using commercially produced cyanide-based pesticides (Zyklon B) and engine-exhaust or carbon-monoxide systems depending on the site; Zyklon B was a hydrogen‑cyanide product used in pellet form at Auschwitz for both delousing and, in purpose‑built gas chambers, mass murder [1] [2] [3]. Other death camps (Belzec, Sobibor, Treblinka, Chełmno) killed by carbon‑monoxide from engine exhaust or gas vans rather than Zyklon B [4] [5].
1. Commercial products repurposed: Zyklon B and cyanide supply chains
Researchers and museums note Zyklon B was a commercial insecticide — hydrogen cyanide marketed in pellet form — and that its production and distribution involved industrial firms; archive records and postwar reporting tie its use in camps to both delousing facilities and homicidal chambers at Auschwitz [1] [2] [6]. Reporting on later controversies reiterates that Zyklon B’s dual civilian uses (pest control, disinfection) created cover for procurement and storage inside the camp complex [1].
2. Storage and on‑site legitimacy: laundry, hospitals and ‘Kanada’ depots
Museum material describes legitimate storage and use areas — laundries, hospitals and supply depots nicknamed “Kanada” — where delousing chemicals were kept and where Zyklon B legitimately served public‑health purposes; those same logistical systems enabled centralized storage close to crematoria and gas‑chamber complexes [1]. The existence of these legitimate functions is documented alongside the overwhelming evidence that separate gas chambers and crematoria were built and used specifically for killing [1] [3].
3. Different technical methods across camps: pellets vs. exhaust vs. vans
The Nazis used multiple dissemination techniques. At Auschwitz and Majdanek, hydrogen cyanide (Zyklon B) in pellet form produced lethal vapour in sealed chambers [2] [3]. In Belzec, Sobibor and Treblinka, victims were killed with carbon monoxide produced by tank or automobile engine exhaust introduced into sealed rooms; Chełmno used gas vans to deliver exhaust to victims [4] [5]. Contemporary and memorial accounts map these method differences to distinct camp infrastructures [4].
4. Delivery and deployment practices: sealed chambers and deception
Victims were often told they were going for delousing or showers; they were directed to undress and enter chambers that could be sealed for timed exposure, and then the toxic gas was introduced by releasing Zyklon B pellets or piping in exhaust; the chamber was left sealed for a period sufficient to kill occupants [4] [3]. Archive and survivor material cited by institutions emphasise the combination of physical infrastructure (morgues converted into chambers, crematoria) and bureaucratic procedures that made the killings systematic [3] [1].
5. Industrial collaborators and destroyed records
Industrial firms and military laboratories were intertwined with chemical production and testing in Nazi Germany; some companies supplied chemical agents and other firms benefited from forced labour nearby, while many records were deliberately destroyed in late 1944 to avoid documentary evidence [6] [7]. Scholarly work notes that orders were sometimes given orally to reduce paper trails, complicating postwar reconstruction [7].
6. Forensic and historical evidence versus revisionist claims
Primary museum archives, tens of thousands of witness accounts, camp administration documents and physical remains establish that separate gas chambers and crematoria were purpose‑built for mass murder — a conclusion institutions explicitly use to rebut claims that these facilities were merely disinfection rooms [1] [3]. Recent media episodes have stressed that archival materials also confirm Zyklon B’s legitimate civilian uses, which some bad‑faith actors have exploited to sow doubt [1].
7. Broader technical context: chemical weaponization and dissemination principles
Wider literature on chemical agents and warfare explains general principles used in dissemination — agents stored/transported as solids or liquids and deployed as vapours or aerosols — and shows how relatively small quantities, appropriate delivery systems and sealed enclosures can produce mass lethality; historians link these technical realities to the camps’ chosen methods [8] [9]. For modern comparison, reporting on later uses of cyanide in non‑wartime executions underscores both the lethality and the logistical requirements of hydrogen cyanide systems [2] [10].
Limitations and competing perspectives: available sources confirm both legitimate delousing uses of Zyklon B and its homicidal deployment, and they document different chemical methods in different camps; available sources do not mention detailed blueprints or step‑by‑step procurement invoices for every camp storage site, because many records were destroyed or remain archived and subject to specialized research [7]. Researchers and memorial institutions (USHMM, National WWII Museum, Holocaust Memorial Day Trust) present the strongest documentary case tying procurement, storage and deployment to organised, state‑directed mass murder [3] [11] [4].