How many state-level charges (e.g., in Georgia or other states) alleging insurrection or similar offenses were filed after January 6 2021?

Checked on December 4, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

State-level prosecutions explicitly charging “insurrection” or rebellion for actions tied to Jan. 6 are scarce in the available reporting; most prosecutions were federal and used statutes such as obstruction and assault, with federal totals exceeding 1,200–1,500 across reporting dates [1] [2] [3]. Sources repeatedly note that “insurrection” is a difficult federal charge to bring and that, through at least early 2024, none of the hundreds of people charged were routinely charged under the statutory insurrection label — state-level uses are not detailed in the provided sources [4] [5] [6].

1. The dominant story: federal prosecutions, not state insurrection counts

Reporting and official tallies show the bulk of Jan. 6 criminal work was handled by federal authorities in the District of Columbia; by various accounts more than 1,000 people had been charged federally (rising through 1,200–1,500+ depending on the snapshot) and the DOJ published centralized lists of defendants in D.C. federal court [1] [3] [7]. Available sources emphasize federal offenses — obstruction of an official proceeding, assault on officers, trespass and related federal felonies and misdemeanors — rather than routine use of state “insurrection” statutes [8] [2].

2. Why “insurrection” rarely appears as a charging instrument

Legal analysts and news outlets explain that the statutory crime of insurrection (18 U.S.C. §2383) is rarely used because it requires proof of intent to engage in rebellion against U.S. authority and courts treat such prosecutions as legally difficult; experts said prosecutors were reluctant to bring insurrection unless they had “rock-solid” evidence [6] [5] [4]. Several outlets note that terms like “sedition” and “insurrection” were widely used in public debate but rarely reflected in formal charges early on [4] [5].

3. State prosecutions: limited, fragmented, and not tallied as “insurrections” in sources

Local reporting from Georgia and other states documents many individuals from those states being arrested and federally charged for Jan. 6 conduct — Georgia produced dozens of federal defendants and examples of state-based reporting on specific defendants — but the sources do not present a compiled count of state-level “insurrection” charges filed after Jan. 6 [9] [10] [11]. Available sources do not mention a comprehensive list or total of state prosecutions that used state insurrection or analogous statutes; they instead emphasize federal case volumes and some state-level prosecutions for related local crimes [7] [3].

4. Where state law matters — riot, rioting and local charges

The Marshall Project and other explainers note that many violent protest offenses historically fall under state riot or related statutes, and that state courts can and do pursue charges such as rioting that overlap conceptually with what laypeople call “insurrection” [4]. But the provided reporting does not enumerate how many states or defendants were charged under those state riot or “inciting to insurrection” provisions after Jan. 6; Georgia-focused coverage discusses individual defendants and prosecutions but not a statewide tally of insurrection-type charges [12] [13].

5. Notable exceptions and high-profile federal seditious-conspiracy convictions

While ordinary participants largely faced federal obstruction and assault charges, specialized prosecutions did include seditious-conspiracy charges against leaders of militia groups — convictions for those charges are reported and highlighted as rare and significant [14] [15]. These seditious-conspiracy outcomes underscore prosecutorial willingness to use the most serious doctrines where evidence showed organized plans to use force to stop the peaceful transfer of power [15] [14].

6. Limitations, open questions and what the sources don’t say

The sources clearly document federal counts and the legal difficulty of proving “insurrection,” but they do not supply a definitive number of state-filed insurrection or equivalent charges after Jan. 6. Available sources do not mention a compiled national tally of state-level insurrection charges nor a clear count for Georgia specifically using that statutory label; therefore a precise numeric answer for state-level “insurrection” charges cannot be drawn from the supplied material (not found in current reporting) [5] [3].

7. Bottom line for readers and callers for further reporting

If you seek a numeric answer — “how many state-level insurrection charges were filed after Jan. 6?” — the available reporting shows extensive federal prosecutions (1,000+ to 1,500+ over time) and discusses isolated seditious-conspiracy cases, but it does not provide a verified count of state-level insurrection charges; deeper, state-by-state legal record searches or official state prosecutor disclosures would be required to produce that tally [1] [3] [4].

Want to dive deeper?
How many state prosecutions related to January 6 have been filed in georgia and what charges were used?
Which states beyond georgia brought insurrection-related or comparable state charges after january 6, 2021?
How do state insurrection or sedition statutes differ from federal charges used for january 6 defendants?
Have state-level outcomes (convictions, dismissals, plea deals) for january 6-related cases differed from federal cases?
What legal hurdles exist for states trying to prosecute insurrection-style offenses tied to january 6 events?