Did trump get convicted of rape or sex

Checked on January 29, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

A civil jury in New York found Donald J. Trump liable for sexually abusing writer E. Jean Carroll and for defaming her, awarding Carroll $5 million in damages in May 2023; that civil finding is not a criminal conviction and the jury explicitly did not find him guilty of the narrow statutory crime of "rape" under New York law [1] [2] [3]. Subsequent judicial commentary and later rulings complicated the public takeaway—Judge Lewis Kaplan and other courts have clarified that what the jury found amounts to sexual assault as commonly understood even if it did not meet New York’s technical statutory definition of rape, and Trump has appealed and continued to contest damages [4] [5] [6].

1. The core legal outcome: civil liability for sexual abuse, not a criminal conviction

A federal jury in Manhattan concluded by a preponderance-of-the-evidence standard that Trump sexually abused Carroll and that he defamed her with later public statements, and the jury awarded $5 million in compensatory and punitive damages—an outcome reached in a civil, not criminal, proceeding, which means there is no criminal conviction or jail sentence arising from that verdict [2] [1] [3].

2. Why news headlines sometimes say “rape” while the verdict did not use that criminal label

Jurors were asked to determine whether the evidence met New York’s narrow statutory definition of rape—limited under that statute to forcible vaginal penetration by a penis—and the jury declined to find liability under that specific label, instead finding a lesser offense of sexual abuse; media outlets and legal documents note that distinction repeatedly [5] [2] [1].

3. Judicial interpretations that blurred the simple “not rape” reading

After the verdict, District Judge Lewis Kaplan and subsequent commentary explained that the jury’s factual findings—about forcible sexual contact in a department-store dressing room—align with many people’s common understanding of rape, even if they do not satisfy that narrow New York statutory definition; Judge Kaplan’s clarification and follow-up rulings have been widely reported [4] [3].

4. Appeals and later rulings changed the stakes and language further

Trump appealed the verdict and pressured various legal processes over damages and admissibility of evidence; appellate filings and later decisions preserved the core finding of liability while government and private reporting tracked separate rulings and further damage awards in related proceedings—reporting has documented additional multimillion-dollar judgments and appeals tied to Carroll’s claims in subsequent years [6] [7].

5. What “convicted” means and why the distinction matters

Several fact-checks and legal analysts emphasize that a civil finding of liability is not a criminal conviction: civil cases impose monetary damages and use a lower standard of proof (preponderance of evidence), whereas criminal convictions require proof beyond a reasonable doubt and carry potential incarceration—therefore statements that Trump was “convicted” of rape mischaracterize the legal record unless explicitly referencing non-criminal adjudications [8].

6. Public discourse, misinformation, and political impact

The verdict and the language around it have been weaponized in public debate: opponents and supporters selectively emphasize different legal terms—“liability,” “sexually abused,” “rape,” or “not convicted”—and fact-checkers have documented instances where social media posts and even media outlets misstated that Trump had been criminally convicted of rape, which feeds confusion about what the courts actually decided [8] [1].

7. Bottom line for readers seeking a simple answer

Legally, Donald Trump was found civilly liable for sexually abusing E. Jean Carroll and for defamation; he was not criminally convicted of rape—though judges and some reporting have stated that the proven conduct fits many people’s common definition of rape even if it did not meet New York’s narrow statutory label at trial, and Trump has continued to contest the rulings on appeal [2] [3] [4].

Want to dive deeper?
What is the legal difference between civil liability for sexual assault and a criminal rape conviction in New York?
How did Judge Lewis Kaplan and the Second Circuit describe the Carroll verdict in later rulings and opinions?
Which other legal cases and evidence were admitted in Carroll v. Trump that influenced the jury's findings?