How do U‑visa bona fide determinations work and how often do they lead to full U‑visa grants?

Checked on February 3, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

The bona fide determination (BFD) is a preliminary USCIS review that checks whether a pending U‑visa petition appears filed in good faith, includes required initial evidence, and raises no national‑security or public‑safety concerns; if granted, it can confer deferred action and a four‑year Employment Authorization Document (EAD) while the full petition waits for a visa number (USCIS policy manual; ILRC) [1] [2]. The BFD does not guarantee final U‑visa approval — numerical limits and a large backlog mean many bona fide petitioners still wait years for a visa, and official, public statistics on the conversion rate from BFD to final U‑visa grant are not provided in the sources reviewed [3] [2] [4].

1. What the BFD review actually checks: evidence, background checks, and discretion

USCIS evaluates whether a Form I‑918 petition contains the initial, required evidence (including Form I‑918, Supplement B when applicable) and conducts background checks to ensure the petitioner poses no national security or public safety risk; the agency then exercises prosecutorial discretion about whether the petitioner “warrants a favorable exercise of discretion” for deferred action and an EAD (USCIS FAQs; NIWAP/USCIS chapter) [5] [1]. In practice that means the BFD is intended to confirm the petition was made in good faith, that basic eligibility is present, and that the record does not trigger disqualifying conduct — not to resolve every legal question about eligibility for a U‑visa (USCIS; ASISTA/ILRC materials) [1] [6].

2. Benefits a BFD actually confers and who can get them

When USCIS issues a BFD it can grant deferred action and authorize employment — typically producing an EAD valid for four years (or in some cases shorter grants observed in practice) — and the petitioner’s qualifying derivatives in the United States can receive similar protections if found bona fide (CLINIC; Immigrant Justice Center) [3] [7]. The BFD authority applies only to petitioners physically inside the United States; those abroad are not eligible for BFD relief under current guidance (NIJC; ILRC) [7] [2].

3. How long the BFD process takes and the scale of the backlog

USCIS adopted the BFD process in June 2021 to address a long backlog that left many petitioners without protection for years, but adjudication delays persist: several sources report that BFDs still take roughly five years from filing in many cases, and that USCIS historically placed most petitions into initial review or waitlist processing within about five years (NIJC; WomensLaw; ILRC) [4] [8] [2]. The backlog is substantial — advocates cited roughly 270,000 pending U‑visa filings when the policy change rolled out — and the statutory cap of 10,000 visas per year means final visa availability remains the gating constraint for actual U‑visa grants (ILRC; ProsePro) [2] [9].

4. Conversion from BFD to final grant: what the reporting shows (and does not)

Private immigration firms and practitioner guides assert that well‑documented, eligible petitioners enjoy high approval rates — many law‑firm blogs and guides suggest approval rates “often exceeding 80%” for applicants who meet eligibility and provide full documentation — but those figures come from private practice observations and are not corroborated by a public USCIS statistic in the materials provided (Jeelani; Jeelani repeat) [10] [11]. Official USCIS and policy documents describe the BFD as satisfying a prima facie standard and note that in many BFD cases USCIS may proceed directly to final adjudication when visas become available, but they do not publish a clear, public conversion rate from BFD to eventual U‑visa grant in the sources reviewed (USCIS manual; CLINIC) [1] [3].

5. Caveats, competing views, and what the absence of public conversion data means

Advocates warn that persistent adjudication delays undermine the BFD’s purpose and have litigated USCIS for slow BFD timelines, underscoring that policy intent and real‑world implementation diverge (NIJC litigation notes) [4]. Practitioners’ optimistic approval‑rate claims reflect selected case experience and should be treated as indicative rather than definitive because the government’s public reporting on final grants following BFDs is limited in the cited documents; therefore any firm percentage of BFD→grant conversions cannot be authoritatively stated from these sources alone (Jeelani; USCIS/ILRC) [10] [1] [2].

Bottom line: the BFD is a meaningful, legally rooted interim protection — it makes work authorization and deferred action available sooner to petitioners who pass an initial evidence and background‑check screen — but it is not a guarantee of a U‑visa, and concrete, system‑wide statistics showing how often a BFD becomes a final U‑visa grant are not supplied in the public documents and practitioner materials reviewed here (USCIS; ILRC; Jeelani; NIJC) [5] [2] [10] [4].

Want to dive deeper?
How many U‑visa petitions are pending and how has that number changed since 2010?
What are the requirements and evidentiary standards for Form I‑918, Supplement B (law enforcement certification)?
What did the 2023 A.M.P. v. DHS class action allege about USCIS delays in BFD adjudications and what is its status?