Is it illegal to make sexual content on ai chatbots as i am 16 and i use myself (a 16yo) as subject? In italy

Checked on January 15, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Creating sexual content with an AI chatbot while portraying oneself as a 16‑year‑old sits in a legally fraught zone in Italy: Italy’s recent AI law establishes strict protections for minors and criminal sanctions for harmful AI-generated content, particularly non‑consensual deepfakes, and it imposes age‑based access and consent rules for AI systems [1] [2] [3]. The sources do not directly state whether a 16‑year‑old generating sexual content about themselves via an AI chatbot is per se a criminal offence, so any definitive legal conclusion would require review of Italian criminal and sexual‑offence statutes beyond the AI law materials provided (no single source here answers that narrow question).

1. Italy’s AI law creates special rules for minors and for harmful or sexualised AI output

Italy’s national AI law and allied commentary emphasise enhanced protection for minors: children under 14 need parental consent to access AI systems and for the processing of their personal data, while older minors (14–17) may in some cases be permitted to give their own consent depending on presentation and comprehension of information [4] [5] [6]. The law also sets criminal‑level sanctions for creating or disseminating AI‑generated content that causes harm, and several summaries note prison terms for malicious deepfakes or other harmful AI uses [2] [7] [8].

2. Age thresholds matter, but they do not alone resolve sexual‑content legality

Multiple sources show Italy distinguishes under‑14s from older teens for AI access rules — under‑14s require parental authorization and 14–18 year‑olds can sometimes consent themselves for AI use if informed appropriately [5] [4]. However, these AI‑access rules govern platform access and data processing: they do not, in the materials supplied, convert every act by a 14–17 year‑old into legal permission to create sexual material; the sources do not set out how general criminal law on sexual conduct, exploitation, or child pornography interacts with self‑created AI sexual content involving minors [4] [5].

3. Deepfakes, non‑consensual sexual imagery and privacy law are criminalised or risky

Italy’s data protection authority and commentators flag that creating “undressed” or sexualised deepfakes of real people without consent can be serious privacy violations and in some cases criminal offences under Italian law, and the AI law specifically tightens penalties for harmful AI content [3] [2] [9]. Legal guides highlight personality‑rights protections and remedies for victims of image‑based manipulation, and Italy has enacted specific transparency and liability measures aimed at deterring exploitative AI content [9] [8].

4. Platform and access restrictions for chatbots are already being enforced

Practical restrictions follow the law: regulators and commentators report bans or strict age‑verification and parental‑consent duties for social chatbots and generative tools unless the provider complies with Italian rules — Italy has previously suspended services (e.g., ChatGPT) and expects operators to implement age checks and safeguards [10] [11] [7]. That means access to certain chatbot features may be blocked or subject to parental oversight for younger users in practice.

5. Where the reporting stops — key legal gaps and the cautionary conclusion

The supplied sources provide strong evidence that Italy treats AI sexualised deepfakes and non‑consensual image manipulation as potentially criminal and that AI access is age‑differentiated [3] [2] [5], but they do not directly state whether a 16‑year‑old creating sexual content about themselves using an AI chatbot is automatically illegal under Italian criminal law; the intersection with child‑sexual‑abuse and child‑pornography statutes, consent doctrines, and privacy/criminal provisions is not fully covered in these AI‑law briefs (no source here answers that specific interaction). Given the regulatory emphasis and penalties for harmful or sexualised AI content, and practical platform restrictions, the pragmatic conclusion is that generating sexual content involving a minor—even of oneself—carries legal and safety risks under Italy’s current AI and privacy regime and may trigger platform bans, reporting, or legal scrutiny; precise criminal liability requires counsel or review of Italy’s broader criminal code and case law beyond the AI law summaries provided [2] [3] [9].

Want to dive deeper?
How does Italian criminal law treat self‑produced sexual images by minors and how does that interact with AI‑generated content?
What obligations do AI platform operators in Italy have for age verification and parental consent under Law No.132/2025?
What Italian case law or prosecutions have addressed AI deepfakes or sexualised AI imagery since 2024?