Your fact-checks will appear here
The distinction between child pornography and non-criminal images of minors, including the role of intent and context.
A small number of democratic legal systems have judicially recognized pornography as a form of protected expression under constitutional or fundamental‑rights law, but those protections are routinely ...
Illinois law criminalizes sexual conduct with animals and treats related imagery with a separate, evolving set of offenses; watching a bestiality act (as an act) is certainly part of that prohibited c...
Strict-ban countries impose a wide spectrum of criminal penalties for producing, distributing, or possessing pornography, ranging from fines and imprisonment to deportation for foreigners and, in extr...
Countries where pornography is "most permitted" are generally liberal democracies with strong free‑speech traditions and limited censorship — notably the United States and Canada and many Western Euro...
Federal law makes it a crime to produce, distribute, receive, transport, advertise, access with intent to view, and possess child sexual abuse material (CSAM), primarily through statutes codified in T...
Texas law treats sexualized images of minors not as “erotica” but as criminal visual material—commonly called child sexual abuse material (CSAM) or child pornography—and penalties scale sharply with q...
Creating sexual content with an AI chatbot while portraying oneself as a 16‑year‑old sits in a legally fraught zone in Italy: Italy’s recent AI law establishes strict protections for minors and crimin...
A federal child sexual material (CSAM) prosecution typically requires that the material depict a minor engaged in "sexually explicit conduct" or that the defendant knowingly induced such conduct for t...
No single country can be confidently named from the available reporting as having "the least blockers" for AI image-to-video porn generators because most major jurisdictions covered in the sources hav...
A small set of headline cases and doctrinal tests have shaped whether filmed consensual fetish acts fall outside First Amendment protection, but most litigation has split along two lines: U.S. courts ...