Do ICE agents receive bonuses for deportations or removals?

Checked on January 13, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Signing and hiring bonuses — including offers of up to $50,000 and student loan repayment packages — have been officially advertised to recruit new ICE officers, but a short-lived internal pilot that promised cash incentives tied specifically to accelerating removals was announced and then withdrawn within hours and officials said it was never authorized [1] [2] [3] [4]. There is clear evidence of recruitment pay and reimbursements for partnering agencies, but no sustained, authorized program paying frontline ICE agents per deportation currently in effect in the reporting provided [5] [4].

1. What is paid, and what the agency is advertising

The most concrete and repeatedly documented payments are recruitment and retention incentives: federal postings and reporting show ICE offering signing bonuses of up to $50,000 and student loan repayment packages reportedly up to $60,000 to attract thousands of new deportation officers amid a large hiring push funded by the One Big Beautiful Bill [1] [2] [6] [7]. ICE and DHS materials and news coverage also note higher potential overtime pay and enhanced retirement benefits as part of the compensation picture, and the agency itself has touted a very successful recruitment campaign and large application numbers thereafter [1] [8] [7].

2. The short-lived “cash for speed” pilot and its withdrawal

Multiple outlets and policy trackers reported that an internal ICE email briefly announced a pilot program offering cash bonuses to agents who expedited deportations — specifically encouraging use of expedited removal to reduce backlogs — but the program was rescinded within hours with DHS officials saying it had not been authorized and was never officially in effect [3] [4]. Local coverage likewise documented the internal memo’s aims to “maximize” bonuses by moving eligible people through fast-track processes, underscoring the program’s operational implications before it was pulled [3].

3. Other payments and reimbursements that look similar to bonuses

While the canceled pilot would have tied pay directly to removals, DHS has also created reimbursement mechanisms and incentives for state and local partners — notably programs to reimburse participating agencies for salaries, benefits and overtime for officers who sign 287(g) agreements and work with ICE to detain and remove “the worst of the worst” — which effectively compensates for removal-related activity though not as a per-deportation cash bonus to federal ICE officers [5]. Reporting also highlights that ICE budgets increased dramatically under recent legislation, funding detention beds, transportation and removals as well as hiring incentives [6] [9].

4. Why the distinction matters — per-deportation pay vs. recruitment incentives

There is an important ethical and operational distinction in the record between paying officers to join and stay (signing bonuses, loan repayment, overtime) and paying them per deportation, which would tie remuneration directly to enforcement outcomes; the former is well-documented in official recruiting materials and coverage, while the latter appears to have been trialed in an internal memo but was not implemented and was publicly disavowed by DHS leadership [1] [2] [3] [4]. Critics and some former agency officials warned that recruitment tactics and large bonuses could change the composition and behavior of the force, but those critiques address incentives broadly rather than proving a sustained per-removal bounty system [10].

5. What the sources do not show

The assembled reporting and official statements do not provide evidence of an authorized, ongoing program that pays ICE agents individual cash bonuses for each deportation as regular policy; available evidence limits claims of per-deportation pay to the canceled internal pilot and to speculation and concern raised in commentary [3] [4]. There is also no public documentation in these sources of national field guidance that reestablished a pay-per-removal incentive after the withdrawal, and if such a program exists it is not described in the cited materials [4].

6. Bottom line

ICE does pay financial incentives tied to recruitment, retention and partnering law enforcement work — including sign-on bonuses up to $50,000, student loan repayment offers and reimbursements for local partners — but reporting shows that a separate pilot offering cash bonuses specifically for speeding deportations was announced and then quickly rescinded and is not an authorized, ongoing policy in the sources provided [1] [2] [5] [3] [4]. Critics warn the broader incentive regime and “wartime recruitment” posture could have downstream effects on enforcement posture and conduct, a concern reflected in expert commentary and internal reviews [10] [11].

Want to dive deeper?
What internal ICE memos or emails exist about performance incentives and how were they handled?
How have signing bonuses and recruitment campaigns historically affected the composition and conduct of federal law enforcement agencies?
What oversight mechanisms exist to prevent pay incentives from creating perverse enforcement incentives within DHS and ICE?