Are there any EU countries that have temporary opt-outs or delays for implementing EES biometrics and which ones?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Several EU/Schengen countries began a staggered, six‑month rollout of the Entry/Exit System (EES) from 12 October 2025 with full deployment expected by April 2026; the system requires biometric capture of non‑EU short‑stay visitors and replaces passport stamping [1] [2]. The EU adopted a regulation allowing a progressive start and temporary derogations so implementation is phased across 29 participating countries rather than switched on simultaneously [2] [3].
1. What the question actually asks: opt‑outs vs. phased delays
The user asked whether any EU countries have “temporary opt‑outs or delays” for EES biometrics. Available EU reporting shows not long‑term national opt‑outs but a negotiated “progressive start” — a deliberate, EU‑level phase‑in and temporary derogations to allow borders to enable EES functions over roughly six months, from 12 October 2025 to around April 2026 [2] [3]. That means implementation timing varies by border point and country, but the legal framework is for a staggered roll‑out, not permanent national exemptions [2].
2. How the phased roll‑out works in practice
EU institutions set the go‑live date (12 October 2025) and envisaged a progressive deployment across external Schengen border crossing points over six months, so some airports, seaports, or land crossings start biometric collection earlier while others switch later; by April 2026 the goal was full operation everywhere covered by the 29 participating countries [2] [3]. Practical guides and travel outlets reported that some crossings continued stamping passports while others began capturing photos and fingerprints as the system “beds in” [1] [4].
3. Legal mechanism: temporary derogations, not country opt‑outs
The European Commission, Parliament and Council agreed a Regulation on “temporary derogations” tied specifically to the progressive start of operations; that regulation entered into force in July 2025 and underpins the phased approach rather than permanent opt‑outs for member states [2]. In short, the law authorises time‑limited exceptions during roll‑out to avoid chaos at busy ports — it is an implementation schedule, not a political carve‑out for particular countries [2].
4. Which countries are in or out of scope, per reporting
Most reporting makes clear the system covers 29 participating countries at Schengen external borders; it excludes EU citizens and certain categories (e.g., some railway crew or transit document holders) and does not apply in the same way to non‑Schengen EU states until a crossing into Schengen occurs [3] [1]. Articles note Ireland and Cyprus remain outside Schengen for this purpose (EES applied at a first Schengen external border if your itinerary later enters Schengen) [5]. If you need a list of the 29 participating countries specifically, available sources do not provide a full roster in these excerpts.
5. Can travellers “opt out” of biometric checks?
Across mainstream coverage the position is firm: EES biometric capture for eligible third‑country nationals is mandatory at participating external borders; refusing biometrics can lead to denial of entry and travellers cannot simply request a manual passport stamping as an alternative once EES is operational at that crossing [6] [7]. Some outlets mention limited operational flexibility — e.g., officers may briefly suspend biometric processing to clear excessive queues — but that is a short‑term operational fallback, not an individual opt‑out right [4].
6. On‑the‑ground variability and practical exemptions
Journalistic and travel guides emphasise variability: some border points and modes (ferries, freight, Channel Tunnel segments) phased in earlier or later, and specific traveller categories (residence card holders tied to EU citizens, certain transit documents, or persons staying on international trains) are out of scope for EES enrolment provided they meet the exemption conditions [3] [1]. These are operational or categorical exemptions, not national policy refusals.
7. Why this matters and what to watch for
The EU’s staged approach reflects political desire to avoid systemic disruption while enforcing a uniform biometric requirement; the legal tool used is temporary derogation for roll‑out, not permanent national opt‑outs [2]. Travellers should therefore assume that if they enter the Schengen external border at a crossing where EES is active, biometric capture is mandatory and refusal risks denial of entry [6] [7]. For precise timing at specific airports, ports or land crossings, check local border‑control announcements and national authorities because implementation timing varied by crossing during the six‑month phased roll‑out [4] [3].
Limitations: these conclusions rely on the cited reporting and EU press material excerpts; available sources do not list a full country‑by‑country timetable in these snippets nor do they show any permanent national opt‑outs beyond the described non‑Schengen situations (available sources do not mention a list of country‑level permanent opt‑outs).