Has Venezuela ever seized US-owned oil assets or shipments?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Yes — Venezuela has a documented history of seizing foreign oil assets that included U.S. companies, most notably during the Chávez-era nationalizations and subsequent expropriations in the 2000s, though contemporary episodes more often involve U.S. seizures of Venezuelan shipments and legal fights over compensation rather than fresh Venezuelan seizures of U.S.-flagged cargo [1] [2].
1. Historical expropriations under Chávez: what happened and who was affected
In the 2000s the Venezuelan government under President Hugo Chávez undertook a broad program of nationalizations and expropriations that reshaped foreign involvement in the country’s oil sector, forcing restructurings and seizing assets from several foreign oil firms, which left U.S. companies with contested claims and long legal battles for compensation [1].
2. The 2007-2008 expropriations are the most relevant precedent
The most commonly cited U.S.-related episode is the 2007 expropriation drive in which foreign companies — including some U.S.-linked interests — saw assets taken or restructured to give PDVSA majority control; those actions underpin later U.S. corporate litigation and are the likely referent when political figures assert that “oil was stolen” from the United States [1] [2].
3. Recent years: the narrative has largely flipped to U.S. seizures of Venezuelan shipments
Since 2019 and especially in December 2025 the operational dynamic has shifted: the United States has seized Venezuelan oil tankers alleged to be carrying sanctioned cargo (for example the M/T Skipper), and imposed sanctions and seizures targeting shipping networks — incidents reported widely in U.S. and international press and by the U.S. Department of Justice [3] [4] [5].
4. Legal aftermath and compensation disputes complicate the “seizure” label
While Venezuela’s 2000s actions amounted to expropriation under Venezuelan law and triggered litigation and arbitration by affected firms, those disputes have produced complex outcomes — companies pursued enforcement and compensation abroad, and the U.S. government has at times exercised its own powers over Venezuelan assets (including the long-running contest over CITGO) — meaning “seizure” can describe different legal and political acts depending on the actor and forum [1] [6].
5. Motives, framing and competing agendas in coverage
Reporting on who “stole” what is freighted with political agendas: Venezuelan officials frame past expropriations as sovereign redistribution and cast U.S. seizures as “piracy,” U.S. officials frame enforcement as counter‑sanctions against illicit shipping and terrorism links, and advocacy outlets emphasize sovereignty and imperialism narratives — readers should weigh these competing framings when assessing claims [6] [7] [4].
6. Limits of available reporting and the narrow answer
The available sources establish that Venezuela did seize foreign oil assets in the 2000s — including assets connected to U.S. companies — and that the contemporary pattern has been reciprocal U.S. seizures of Venezuelan shipments and assets; however, the provided reporting does not list a recent, direct Venezuelan seizure of a U.S.-flagged oil shipment in the last several years, so definitive claims about any single modern incident cannot be made from these sources alone [1] [3] [4].