What are Pew Research Center’s three migration scenarios and how do they change Europe’s 2050 demographics?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Pew Research Center modeled three clear migration scenarios—zero, medium and high—to show how different future flows would affect the size and share of Europe’s Muslim population by 2050, finding growth in every scenario because of age and fertility differences [1]. Under Pew’s mid-2016 baseline, the Muslim share of the 30-country Europe studied rises to about 7.4% with zero migration, to roughly 11.2% under a medium-migration trajectory, and to near 14% under a high-migration continuation [1] [2].
1. What Pew’s three migration scenarios actually are
Pew’s “zero migration” scenario assumes that starting in mid‑2016 Europe’s borders effectively close and no further migrants arrive, a theoretical exercise used to isolate demographic momentum [1]. The “medium migration” scenario assumes continued regular migration—economic, family and education‑related flows—while the record asylum influxes of 2014–2016 subside, representing a plausible ongoing pace of migrants into Europe [3] [4]. The “high migration” scenario treats the 2014–2016 refugee and migration levels and religious composition as continuing indefinitely, a higher‑end trajectory intended to show what sustained elevated arrivals would yield [3] [4].
2. How each scenario changes Europe’s 2050 Muslim share and totals
Even with migration halted, Pew projects Europe’s Muslim population to increase from an estimated 25.8 million in 2016 to about 35.8 million by 2050, raising the share from 4.9% to roughly 7.4% [2] [1]. Under the medium scenario, the Muslim population roughly doubles in share—Pew estimates about 11.2% of Europe in 2050, roughly 58.8 million people in their reporting—making this the centerline outcome many analysts consider most plausible [5] [2]. In the high‑migration scenario the Muslim share rises still further, to about 14% of Europe’s population by 2050 if the 2014–2016 influx continued without abating [2] [6].
3. Why growth occurs even with no migration: age and fertility
Pew emphasizes that demographic momentum drives growth: Europe’s Muslim population is much younger on average than its non‑Muslim counterpart and has a higher fertility rate, so even absent migration their numbers and share grow as older non‑Muslim cohorts age and shrink [1] [5]. Pew’s country breakdown shows these dynamics operate unevenly—countries with relatively large, young Muslim populations in 2016 (France, Belgium, Italy, the UK) see measurable share increases even under zero migration, while many eastern European countries remain largely unaffected because their Muslim populations start from near zero [1].
4. Geographic winners and losers under different scenarios
Pew’s country projections highlight stark variation: in the medium scenario the UK, Sweden and other western European states see much larger Muslim shares than eastern Europe; for example, Germany could rise substantially and Sweden and the UK see some of the largest proportional increases under elevated migration scenarios [3] [4]. Under the high scenario Germany and Sweden show particularly large rises—Pew and subsequent reporting have noted Germany’s Muslim share could near 20% and Sweden’s could exceed 30% in extreme continuations of 2014–16 flows—whereas Poland and many eastern states remain under 1% in all scenarios [3] [5].
5. Caveats, methodology and competing framings
Pew stresses these are scenario projections—not forecasts—and they start from a mid‑2016 baseline synthesized from censuses and surveys; asylum seekers not expected to remain were treated differently in flow estimates and methodology choices shape outcomes [4] [1]. Critics and other analysts point out additional uncertainties—fertility convergence, changing migration policy, economic shifts and long‑term assimilation—that could alter trajectories; policy‑centered projections and UN work show different dependency ratios and labour‑force implications under alternative assumptions [7] [8]. Reporting that emphasizes dramatic country‑level change sometimes simplifies Pew’s nuance; the center itself calls the medium scenario the “most realistic endpoint” given likely continued but reduced migration [2].
6. What this means politically and economically
The projections are a demographic roadmap more than a political destiny: rising shares imply questions for social policy, labour markets and integration—but outcomes depend on fertility trends, migrant selection and policy choices, and alternative analyses warn that without migration some countries face shrinking workforces and strain on pension ratios [8] [9]. Pew’s scenarios show that migration levels materially change Europe’s demographic composition by 2050, yet they also illustrate that demographic momentum alone guarantees meaningful change even if borders were to close [1] [2].