How does the Muslim population in Manchester compare to London in 2025?
Executive summary
Greater Manchester has a higher share of Muslims in its population than London in 2025 — roughly one in five residents in Manchester identify as Muslim versus about 15% in London — but London still contains the largest absolute number of Muslims in the country because of its much larger population [1] [2] [3]. These comparisons rest on recent census-derived summaries and extrapolations; local concentrations, ethnic make-up, age structure and socioeconomic differences complicate any simple tally [4] [5].
1. Manchester: a city where Muslims are a sizable share of the population
Manchester’s Muslim share is commonly reported around 20–22% of city residents, a figure reflected in multiple mappings and a recent New York Times profile that put Muslim identification at about one-fifth of Manchester’s roughly 550,000 urban population [1] [2]. That concentration means Muslim communities are highly visible in city life, civic institutions and services, and the demographic is comparatively young — a pattern noted across northern English cities and highlighted in regional analyses of Greater Manchester’s ethnic and religious profile [6] [7].
2. London: lower percentage but far larger numbers in absolute terms
London’s Muslim share is lower as a percentage — commonly reported near 15% of residents in 2025 — yet because London’s total population is several times that of Manchester, the capital houses the largest Muslim population in absolute numbers in the UK [3] [1]. London also contains highly concentrated sub-communities — for example, large Bangladeshi and Arab Muslim populations in boroughs such as Tower Hamlets, Newham and parts of west and north London — which shape local cultures and politics in ways that raw citywide percentages can obscure [8].
3. Different geographies, different compositions
The Muslim populations of Manchester and London differ not only by size and share but by ethnic mix and settlement patterns: London’s Muslim community includes large Bangladeshi and Arab presences and a wide spread across boroughs, whereas Manchester and Greater Manchester have substantial Pakistani, Bangladeshi, Somali and other South Asian and East African-origin communities concentrated in particular wards and towns across the conurbation [8] [6] [9]. These compositional differences affect language use, religious institutions, and local political representation, and they mean experiences within “Muslim communities” are far from uniform [4].
4. Age, deprivation and social indicators matter for interpretation
National and civic reports stress that British Muslim communities are younger on average and are overrepresented in more deprived areas, a dynamic visible in both London and Greater Manchester and one that shapes schooling, employment and public services [4] [7]. The Muslim Council of Britain’s census summary underscores that many Muslim households live in areas with higher unemployment and deprivation, a point that tempers purely numerical comparisons with social reality [4] [5].
5. Absolute numbers vs. percentage share: why both matter
Comparing Manchester and London requires distinguishing percentage share from absolute population. A 15% Muslim share in a megacity like London translates to a larger community in raw numbers than a 20% share in Manchester; conversely, a higher local share in Manchester yields greater local visibility and political weight within that city [1] [2]. Policy, representation and services respond to both metrics — councils plan around local concentration, while national organisations and faith bodies consider total population for resource allocation [4].
6. Caveats, data limits and competing estimates
Most widely cited figures for 2025 draw on 2021 census data, expert summaries and extrapolations; some web-based maps and articles use slightly different baselines and produce varying percentages [4] [1] [9]. The Muslim Council of Britain and mapping projects offer authoritative snapshots, but estimates for 2025 remain subject to migration flows, differential fertility and local demographic change that post-date 2021 census collection — a limitation present in several of the sources used [4] [9].