What aren't white iqs increasing in america

Checked on February 5, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

The simple answer: white American IQs have shown only modest gains over the late 20th century and — according to recent, imperfect data — little to no continued increase and even declines in some cognitive domains from 2006–2018; the historical upward trend (the Flynn effect) and the narrowing Black–White gap were driven more by faster gains among non‑white groups than by large continued rises among whites [1] [2] [3]. Recent work suggests a plateau or reversal in several domains, but the data, methods and sampling issues mean causation remains contested [4] [5] [6].

1. The long view: Flynn-era rises, but modest recent white gains

Across the 20th century the Flynn effect documented consistent IQ increases in Western countries—often cited as 3–5 points per decade—and U.S. data show that whites experienced some of those gains [4] [1]; a NAEP‑based projection found white cognitive measures rising from a 1978/80 benchmark of 100.00 to about 102.28 by 2012, a small net gain relative to other groups [2].

2. The narrowing Black–White gap was not driven by falling white scores

Multiple reviews and analyses conclude the Black–White test‑score gap narrowed in the later 20th century because Black and Hispanic scores rose faster than white scores, not because white performance fell, reinforcing the role of environmental change rather than a static white baseline eroding over time [1] [7] [3] [8].

3. Newer studies: mixed signals and domain‑specific declines

A large SAPA online sample analyzed from 2006–2018 finds declines across three of four broad cognitive domains (logic, verbal/matrix/mathematical reasoning) but increases in spatial ability (3D rotation), producing headlines about a “reverse Flynn effect” even as authors caution against simplistic interpretations [4] [9]. Reporting outlets highlight the pattern but also flag limits in sampling and measurement [5] [6].

4. Measurement and sampling caveats that matter to the question

The recent downward findings rely on a convenience, internet‑based sample that skews toward better‑educated volunteers and uses a composite of subtests not identical to classical standardized IQ batteries; critics therefore warn these trends may partly reflect test design, sampling, or cohort effects rather than a national collapse in white cognitive ability [5] [6]. Historical comparisons also depend on test standardization changes that complicate straight line comparisons across decades [1].

5. Plausible environmental explanations—wide but unproven

Researchers offer many hypotheses for the plateau or domain‑specific declines—changes in education quality, nutrition, health, screen time and media exposure among others—but existing studies present these as competing possibilities rather than settled causes, and the original authors explicitly stop short of claiming Americans (or white Americans specifically) are genetically or inherently becoming less intelligent [4] [9] [6].

6. Politics, headlines and hidden agendas in coverage

Coverage of the recent decline has been prone to sensational framing—“Americans are getting dumber”—even when study authors caution against that interpretation; conversely, groups defending the stability of intelligence emphasize methodological limits to blunt policy panic, so readers should note that some outlets prioritize catchiness over nuance [9] [5] [6]. Analysts who stress environmental causation argue that rapid score shifts across groups undermine genetic explanations, a perspective advanced explicitly in scholarly and advocacy pieces [10] [7].

7. Bottom line: why white IQs aren’t clearly rising now

The best reading of the available reporting is that white Americans experienced modest historical gains but not the large, sustained increases that defined the mid‑20th century Flynn effect; recent data suggest stagnation or decline in several cognitive domains for the overall U.S. sample—affecting whites too—yet measurement limits, sample bias, and unresolved causal factors mean the conclusion is provisional and policy responses should focus on environmental levers (education, health, inequality) highlighted across the literature [2] [4] [3] [6].

Want to dive deeper?
How did the Flynn effect differ across racial and ethnic groups in the United States?
What methodological criticisms have been raised about the 2006–2018 SAPA study reporting IQ declines?
What environmental interventions have been shown to raise standardized cognitive test scores in population studies?