Your fact-checks will appear here
The assembled reporting and advocacy analyses show that, through 2025, the U.S. government has sharply reduced or redirected funding that previously supported LGBTQ+ and diversity programs overseas, u...
The reporting and research in these documents show that foreign aid for LGBTQ(IQ) programs was both widespread and recently disrupted: Outright International documents , and reporting highlights acute...
Based on the materials provided, , but the sources do not show a single unified Democratic bill or explicit funding line passed in Congress. Coverage points to , meaning Democrats and allied NGOs have...
When U.S. foreign assistance for LGBTQI+ programs is frozen or cut, NGOs respond through a mix of damage control—staff layoffs, program closures and rapid service triage—and innovation, including dive...
Local governments across the U.S. are a major locus of protections for transgender people: as of April 1, 2025 at least 395 municipalities — plus Washington, D.C. and 21 states — had explicit nondiscr...
U.S. funding for LGBTQ programs is portrayed by the provided sources as a significant enabler of human rights and economic inclusion in recipient countries, but the evidence offered is largely program...
The claim "was the US government funding overseas pro-gay activities" is partly true in that multiple strands of US policy, congressional advocacy, and NGO partnerships have involved support for LGBTQ...