Your fact-checks will appear here
A series of audio recordings attributed to Sasha/Sascha Riley have circulated widely since late 2025, alleging severe trafficking and abuse connected to Jeffrey Epstein’s network, but as of January 20...
No public, on-the-record statement from the Department of Justice or the FBI confirming, corroborating, or detailing an investigation tied specifically to the Sasha/Sascha Riley audio recordings has b...
No public court filing, indictment, or verified legal record published to date references Sasha/Sascha Riley or the specific allegations contained in the viral audio recordings; multiple news outlets ...
No major news organization has independently authenticated the Sasha/Sascha Riley audio recordings; outlets that have covered the story report the tapes as unverified and published primarily from a Su...
Major fact‑checking organizations have responded to viral Epstein‑related audio by treating clips as unverified until subjected to forensic analysis, by flagging portions identified as AI‑generated, a...
No public statement from the Department of Justice or the FBI acknowledging that either agency has opened an investigation specifically tied to Sasha/Sascha Riley’s viral audio recordings or that they...
A targeted review of the reporting and document collections provided shows no verified court record, deposition, or official DOJ/FBI document cited in these sources that names a "William Riley" in con...
The available reporting shows widespread public claims that documents relevant to Sasha/Sascha Riley’s viral audio exist and “can be obtained” via FOIA or public records requests, but there is no veri...
The single most definitive public record that establishes a parent–child relationship in Georgia is a certified birth certificate naming the parent; other conclusive proof can come from court orders (...
No law‑enforcement agency or established mainstream newsroom has publicly authenticated the audio recordings attributed to as released by ; multiple reports state the tapes remain by courts, , or poli...
Mainstream outlets covering the audio uniformly report that the recordings remain unverified and that no court, law‑enforcement agency, or has authenticated the material . Publishers of the tapes asse...
No major news outlet has authenticated the Sasha/Sascha Riley audio through independent forensic analysis; multiple outlets reporting on the tapes note explicitly that the recordings remain unverified...
No law‑enforcement agency has publicly confirmed receiving or investigating the audio recordings attributed to “Sasha/Sascha Riley”; multiple news outlets and specialty reporters note the publisher’s ...
The public record shows no independent, verifiable official statement from the FBI or any named local police department that confirms receiving, investigating, or otherwise validating the audio record...
No mainstream investigative outlet or any public law enforcement agency has corroborated the substantive allegations in the viral Sasha/Sascha Riley audio recordings; reporting across multiple publica...
Major newsrooms insist on corroboration, documentation and editorial vetting before publishing explosive audio testimony—standards rooted in traditional verification practices and formal ethics polici...
There are no publicly available, on-the-record statements from the Department of Justice or the FBI addressing the Sasha/Sascha Riley audio recordings in the reporting provided; mainstream and regiona...