Your fact-checks will appear here
Allegations of widespread fraud in the 2020 US presidential election, specifically in Michigan and Arizona, have been debunked by analyses emphasizing robust safeguards and expert assessments.
Independent reviews and exhaustive fact-checking found that votes cast in the names of deceased people in the 2020 U.S. presidential election were vanishingly rare and amounted to a tiny fraction of t...
The short, evidence-based answer: there were dozens to a few hundred investigated or alleged instances tied to the , but confirmed criminal prosecutions and convictions related specifically to alterin...
The best contemporaneous reporting and peer-reviewed analysis conclude that in the presidential election was vanishingly small and not systematic: an review identified fewer than 475 potential cases a...
No credible, legally persuasive evidence has been provided that proves the was stolen; dozens of court rulings, federal officials, and multiple independent studies found no widespread fraud sufficient...
Verified instances of voter fraud tied to the were vanishingly small compared with the tens of millions of ballots cast: major post‑election reviews and reporting projects found fewer than 475 potenti...
Yes—there were isolated, proven instances of , as there are in most elections, but exhaustive reporting, court rulings, statistical analyses, and statements from specialists found no evidence of wides...
Extensive, peer-reviewed and investigative reporting finds in federal elections is vanishingly rare—measured in fractions of a percent, and typically so small it could not have changed outcomes in con...
The most comprehensive public reporting found that formal referrals and investigations tied to alleged were very small in number and overwhelmingly declined by prosecutors — counted just under 475 pot...
The best, publicly available post‑election reviews and court rulings found no evidence of widespread or outcome‑changing in the ; methodical reviews flagged fewer than 475 potential instances of unlaw...
election results is not a single legal act but a chain of state and federal procedures—canvass, certification, appointing electors, transmission, and congressional counting—that is governed by state s...
Yes — there is proof of in , but it is overwhelmingly a matter of isolated, provable incidents rather than widespread conspiracies that have changed major election outcomes; multiple databases and cou...
There is no credible evidence that widespread voting by non-citizens — “illegals” — flipped the 2020 presidential election; exhaustive post‑election litigation and multi‑news investigations found only...
State-level prosecutions and administrative referrals tied to alleged irregularities in the were real but numerically limited, scattered across many states, and concentrated both in some high-profile ...
Contemporaneous claims that Smartmatic had operational and ownership ties to the Venezuelan government rested on a mix of corporate records, media reporting about early Venezuelan contracts, a 2006 U....