Your fact-checks will appear here
The challenge of identifying and attributing AI-generated content in CSAM cases
There is no publicly reported, reliable “average time of investigation” for CyberTipline reports because NCMEC reviews and refers tips to law enforcement but does not control or reliably track downstr...
Yale Medicine and Dr. Ania M. Jastreboff have publicly stated that the viral “pink salt trick” for weight loss is not medically supported and has no connection to her or Yale, and Yale’s specialist pr...
The most persuasive proving dominion and control over CSAM are those that link the illicit material to an account or device with corroborating temporal, behavioral, and system-level metadata — specifi...
It is reasonably likely that at least one xAI employee—or a content-moderation system tied to xAI—reviewed and flagged AI-generated images that were borderline (partial nudity, not overtly sexual), be...
A tip to NCMEC alleging nude images of underage girls generated by AI would usually be accepted into the CyberTipline and treated as a report of potential child sexual exploitation, but whether local ...
Courts and investigators across jurisdictions are wrestling with whether and how algorithmic outputs—hashes, AI detections, and similarity scores—can establish probable cause in warrants for child sex...
Creating sexual content with an AI chatbot while portraying oneself as a 16‑year‑old sits in a legally fraught zone in Italy: Italy’s recent AI law establishes strict protections for minors and crimin...
Courts determine whether a clothed image of a minor is "sufficiently sexually suggestive" by applying statutory definitions of sexually explicit conduct and then assessing contextual factors — pose, s...
Careful reporting and multiple watchdog threads show there is not an official Rachel Maddow channel called "Maddow's Brief"; what circulates on YouTube under that or similar names appears to be impers...