Your fact-checks will appear here
Crowds on Demand is a publicity and advocacy firm that supplies hired participants for demonstrations, PR stunts and corporate events.
Crowds on Demand has been the subject of recurring ethical controversy and at least one high-profile legal accusation, largely centered on its business of hiring actors to simulate public support or o...
Crowds on Demand is a publicity firm that has drawn repeated accusations of selling “astroturf” and staged protests, but the reporting provided does not identify any civil or criminal lawsuits filed a...
Crowds on Demand surfaced in 2024 coverage as a player at the intersection of paid publicity, local political influence and national protest debates, most notably via reporting that the firm was hired...
Crowds on Demand’s own public evidence about past clients and activities consists mainly of promotional case studies and CEO interviews that describe the company’s services and selective anecdotes, wh...
There is no clear, sourced public record in the provided reporting that a former Dallas Justice Now employee explicitly "admitted to working for Crowds on Demand." The Texas Observer and related repor...
National advocacy groups finance mass actions through a blend of foundation grants, grassroots donations routed through platforms and fiscal sponsors, and targeted rapid‑response fundraising; they sta...
Yes — Crowds on Demand markets itself explicitly for political rallies, protests and election-related events and has been hired for advocacy and campaign work, though independent, verifiable records o...
Crowd‑for‑hire companies have verifiable ties to U.S. political events, but the record is selective, contested, and often obscured by nondisclosure; the clearest confirmed examples involve the firm Cr...
Crowds on Demand bills itself as a publicity and advocacy firm that supplies hired participants for demonstrations, PR stunts and corporate events and says it has run campaigns ranging from airport gr...