Your fact-checks will appear here
Denmark's prime minister investment in Greenland national security, Denmark's broader fiscal commitment to Arctic security and NATO-led cooperative activity
Reporting is mixed: several outlets initially listed Canada among NATO partners sending personnel to Denmark’s Greenland exercise, Operation Arctic Endurance, but official Canadian defence spokespeopl...
Denmark provides Greenland an annual “block grant” worth roughly DKK 3.4–3.9 billion (commonly reported in recent sources as about USD 500–600 million), a transfer that historically covers more than h...
Denmark cannot practically or legitimately unilaterally "sell" Greenland as if it were estate property; Greenland is an autonomous territory with rights to self-determination and strong, repeated publ...
The 1951 Denmark–US defense agreement established U.S. responsibility to assist in the defence of Greenland under NATO and created a durable legal framework for American basing and operations on the i...
The –U.S. Defense Agreement formally replaced the and converted near‑unrestricted American basing rights into a peacetime, ‑framed arrangement that specified defense areas and tied U.S. presence to al...
The 2004 Igaliku update formally amended the 1951 U.S.–Denmark Defense of Greenland agreement to bring Greenland’s Home Rule (later self‑government) institutions into the defence dialogue, add joint p...
Greenland is not an independent sovereign state; it is an autonomous, self-governing country within the constitutional Kingdom (Realm) of Denmark, exercising control over most domestic affairs while D...
Greenland’s legal path to independence is spelled out primarily in the 2009 Greenland Self-Government Act: a Greenlandic decision in favour of independence would trigger negotiations with Denmark, req...
The 2023 Denmark–US Defense Cooperation Agreement (DCA) does not replace the 1951 Greenland defense treaty or the NATO Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA); rather it builds a new, bilateral basing and o...
The 1951 Defense of Greenland Agreement is a bilateral treaty between Denmark and the United States that was enacted with Danish parliamentary approval and is expressly tied to NATO collective-defense...
Greenland is strategically important to U.S. and allied defense today — particularly because of U.S. early‑warning and radar facilities at Pituffik (formerly Thule) that help detect long‑range missile...
Greenland’s legal-political evolution since the 1951 Defense Agreement has shifted real political authority from Copenhagen to Nuuk while leaving defense and ultimate sovereignty formally with the Kin...
Greenland’s Home Rule of 1979 moved most domestic governance out of Copenhagen’s hands but left Denmark firmly in charge of external affairs, defense and — at least initially — subsoil resources . The...
Denmark has publicly announced an expanded Danish military presence in and around Greenland and invited allied contingents to participate in exercises and scouting missions, framing the moves as to “s...
Danish and ic officials have framed proposal to as a diplomatic problem to be managed, but one bounded by an unequivocal red line: sovereignty is not for sale or negotiable. and have engaged in trilat...
official announcements and Defence Ministry releases publicly name the Danish exercise "," confirm an increased Danish military presence in and outline broad categories of allied participation (aircra...
Denmark has not announced it will "cut all diplomatic connections" with the United States; instead Copenhagen has lodged repeated protests, summoned the U.S. ambassador, pushed for diplomatic resoluti...
Greenlandic political positions since 1951 have balanced assertions of Danish-backed sovereignty with persistent demands for local consultation and control over resources, while legal arguments about ...
The message President Trump sent to Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre bluntly linked his campaign to seize “complete and total control” of Greenland to his belief that Norway’s failure to awar...
Any lawful transfer or “sale” of Greenland would have to navigate entrenched Danish sovereignty, Greenlandic self-determination rights and a body of international law that forbids acquisition by force...