Your fact-checks will appear here
The constitutional protections against unreasonable searches and seizures, and the requirement for judicial warrants to enter private residences.
Legal observers and “ Watch” volunteers are organized community networks trained to document , alert neighbors, connect detainees to lawyers and provide post-event support; they operate through hotlin...
The legality of ’s recent tactics cannot be answered with a simple yes or no; federal authority gives ICE broad powers to detain and arrest suspected immigration violators, but those powers are constr...
Yes — recent reporting shows has begun using administrative-authority directives that allow officers in to force entry into homes without a judge‑signed (judicial) warrant, and that tactic has been im...
Police and federal agents may lawfully demand identification when the encounter rises to a lawful Terry stop—that is, when officers have reasonable, articulable suspicion of criminal activity—because ...
American citizens retain constitutional protections during encounters with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE): the right to remain silent, protections against unreasonable searches and seizures...
Federal immigration officers generally cannot lawfully force their way into a private home without a judicial (neutral magistrate‑signed) warrant unless a narrow exception applies — such as true exige...
Yes — in most circumstances individuals can refuse entry to ICE agents who only present an internal “administrative” or agency warrant; only a judicial warrant signed by a judge (or another recognized...
against unlawful detention by center on the ’s ban on unreasonable searches and seizures, guarantees, and some First Amendment and statutory safeguards that limit where and how can operate . Courts, ,...
Refusing or failing to produce identification to does not, by itself, automatically render a search or arrest unlawful in court; courts focus on statutory authority, probable cause, warrants, consent ...
has repeatedly treated the home as the ’s “core” privacy space and has long held that, absent recognized exceptions, nonconsensual entry into a home requires judicial authorization—doctrinal touchston...
If Immigration and Customs Enforcement arrives at a residence without a judicial warrant, occupants may refuse to open the door and should insist on seeing a judge-signed warrant before consenting to ...
The short answer: has asserted in an internal 2025 memo that agents may enter homes using administrative warrants (Form I‑205) and, in some circumstances, make warrantless arrests when they believe so...
held that an overnight guest has a reasonable expectation of privacy in the host’s home sufficient to challenge a and arrest there, extending the protection afforded to homeowners to certain non‑owner...
citizens wrongfully arrested or detained by have legal remedies that include immediate steps to secure release, civil litigation for money damages and injunctive relief, and administrative avenues for...
People arrested by after a warrantless home entry have a range of legal remedies — immediate procedural challenges in immigration custody and removal proceedings, civil suits seeking damages or injunc...
Local judges in issued sweeping preliminary injunctions that barred from detaining, pepper‑spraying or retaliating against peaceful observers and ruled that safely following agents in vehicles does no...