Your fact-checks will appear here
The controversy surrounding immigration detainers and Minnesota's handling of them.
During the Clinton years ICE’s predecessor systems and enforcement tools produced some of the highest deportation counts in modern history, and during the Obama administration ICE shifted toward “prio...
is not systematically "forcing" and to hunt down released immigrants by uniformly refusing to hand people directly to federal authorities; the situation is a mix of legal constraints, varying county p...
did not issue a blanket statutory refusal to hand over criminals: state law imposes duties for extradition and cooperation with criminal process , and federal and state practice shows transfers do occ...
’s statutory authority to arrest and detain noncitizens in public flows principally from as implemented by , which allows officers to take into custody noncitizens who are subject to removal or who ar...
Counties that honor ICE detainers risk civil and constitutional liability for unlawful arrest and detention, exposure to expensive settlements and lawsuits, and conflicts with state laws that restrict...
in the last five years have produced a patchwork of decisions that both constrain and affirm federal immigration enforcement powers vis-à-vis cities and states: a federal judge blocked from conditioni...