Your fact-checks will appear here
Collaboration between local police and ICE under Section 287(g) of the Immigration and Nationality Act
county sheriffs have pointed to concrete legal risks — including the absence of state statutory authority to detain people on civil detainers, exposure to civil liability for unlawful arrests or deten...
agents face a mix of statutory duties, organizational performance pressures, explicit financial and career incentives, and political and industry-driven incentives that together shape why and how arre...
The core question asks how local-law-enforcement partnerships—most visibly the —have changed cooperation between municipal, county, and state police and across both civil and criminal immigration miss...
Sheriff’s offices scaled back routine compliance with detainer requests after the Third Circuit’s decision and the Miranda‑Olivares district court ruling signaled that detainers were non‑binding and c...
The federal government has layered a menu of monetary incentives to expand immigration enforcement that includes large budget increases for , hiring bonuses and recruitment incentives for ICE officers...
Local police–ICE collaboration is built primarily on Section 287(g) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, under which ICE can delegate specified immigration-enforcement functions to trained state or...