Your fact-checks will appear here
A Supreme Court case that permitted prohibitions on child pornography because those works are produced by abusing children.
U.S. courts have long drawn a line between protected speech and criminal content—routinely holding that child pornography is unprotected and that possession or viewing can be criminalized—yet the mate...
The in v. struck down parts of the that criminalized “virtual child pornography” — images that appear to depict minors but were produced without using real children — holding that those provisions wer...
law draws a firm line between sexual depictions involving real children—which the has treated as unprotected child pornography—and purely fictional or animated sexual content, which is regulated prima...