Your fact-checks will appear here
The governance of public enterprises in Greenland, including extractive industries, and its contribution to economic stability.
A lawful transfer of Greenland to another state would require peaceful, negotiated cession that respects Danish sovereignty and Greenlandic self-determination — not a unilateral sale or seizure — and ...
Greenland’s corporate landscape is anchored by a handful of large, visible players in fishing, air transport and public administration — notably Royal Greenland, Naalakkersuisut and Air Greenland — wh...
Greenland’s Home Rule of 1979 moved most domestic governance out of Copenhagen’s hands but left Denmark firmly in charge of external affairs, defense and — at least initially — subsoil resources . The...
Greenlandic authorities occupy a complex, sometimes ambiguous role in decisions about foreign basing under the 1951 Defense of Greenland Agreement: legally, Denmark retained responsibility for defence...
The 2009 Greenland Self‑Government Act transferred authority over mineral resources to Greenland and set a legal framework for how mineral revenues accrue and interact with the Danish annual subsidy, ...
Greenland’s Mineral Resources Act operationalizes the Self‑Government Act’s grant that mineral‑resource revenues accrue to Greenland, while the Self‑Government Act sets a built‑in Danish subsidy reduc...
President Trump’s quip — “The fact that they landed a boat there 500 years ago doesn’t mean they own the land” — compresses three separate debates into one sentence: the historical roots of human pres...
Greenland is an autonomous territory within the Kingdom of Denmark: legally part of the Danish realm but exercising extensive self-government since 1979 with powers expanded under the 2009 Self-Govern...
The short answer is: no — the claim that “Greenland is covered with Russian and Chinese ships all over the place” is an overstatement not supported by available reporting; there are indeed Russian and...