Your fact-checks will appear here
Long-standing defense arrangements between the U.S. and Denmark covering Greenland.
Pituffik Space Base — long known as Thule Air Base — is the United States’ sole remaining military installation in Greenland, maintained under a 1951 defence agreement with Denmark and operated as a S...
— has never been a U.S. possession or part of the , though has repeatedly sought to control or influence the island through wartime defense arrangements, base rights and several purchase proposals tha...
The principal legal framework governing U.S. military presence in Greenland is the 1951 Defense of Greenland Agreement between the United States and the Kingdom of Denmark, negotiated at NATO’s reques...
Denmark cannot practically or legitimately unilaterally "sell" Greenland as if it were estate property; Greenland is an autonomous territory with rights to self-determination and strong, repeated publ...
The short answer: no — the 1951 U.S.–Denmark defense agreement gives Washington sweeping operational rights in Greenland but does not lawlessly permit the United States to “set up whatever military pr...
The governing, long-standing legal framework that gives broad military basing and access rights in is the 1951 Defense of Greenland Agreement between the United States and , which allows U.S. forces t...
Greenland’s place inside the Kingdom of Denmark and under NATO protection rests on layered domestic law, bilateral defence treaties and alliance arrangements rather than on a single document: Danish c...
The 6 August 2004 Igaliku update to the 1951 U.S.–Denmark Defense Agreement formally amended and supplemented the original treaty to recognize Greenland’s changed constitutional status and to add Gree...
The April 9, 1941 “Agreement Relating to the Defense of Greenland,” signed by Danish Ambassador Henrik Kauffmann and U.S. Secretary Cordell Hull, gave the United States broad wartime rights to defend ...
A forced U.S. seizure of Greenland remains unlikely but not impossible in rhetorical terms: the White House has publicly said using the military is “always an option,” and President Trump has repeated...
Greenland’s political leadership has firmly rejected any notion of U.S. acquisition or unilateral takeover while accepting the logic of stronger allied defence on the island—preferably multilateral an...
The did not rewrite the 1951 framework but layered political and consultative safeguards onto it: the Igaliku amendment explicitly acknowledged ’s Home Rule institutions and created formal consultatio...
The – “Defense of ” agreement established -based U.S. defense rights in Greenland while explicitly recognizing Danish sovereignty, but it was implemented alongside secret annexes—most notably a Top Se...
created broad U.S. rights to establish and use “defense areas” . narrows that legal footprint by formally concentrating U.S. access to the Pituffik (Thule) base, embeds Greenlandic authorities into co...
on the Defense of is a bilateral treaty between and that frames U.S. military rights and responsibilities in Greenland as an implementation of obligations, but it does not read as an unconditional, st...
established and expanded military bases in through a combination of wartime bilateral arrangements, a formal 1951 defense treaty with that carved out "defense areas" and permissive jurisdictional rule...
Greenland is strategically important to U.S. and allied defense today — particularly because of U.S. early‑warning and radar facilities at Pituffik (formerly Thule) that help detect long‑range missile...
The 1951 U.S.–Denmark “Defense of Greenland” agreement authorizes U.S. forces to establish, operate and use designated “defense areas” in Greenland as part of NATO collective-defense planning, but it ...
Pursuit of Greenland by the United States — whether through purchase, political pressure, or the threatened use of military force — would not immediately endanger existing U.S. facilities like Pituffi...
Agreement grants the right—on the basis of collective defense plans—to establish, construct, operate and use “defense areas” in Greenland, including ports, airfields and communications facilities, whi...