Your fact-checks will appear here
Long-standing defense arrangements between the U.S. and Denmark covering Greenland.
Pituffik Space Base — long known as Thule Air Base — is the United States’ sole remaining military installation in Greenland, maintained under a 1951 defence agreement with Denmark and operated as a S...
The principal legal framework governing U.S. military presence in Greenland is the 1951 Defense of Greenland Agreement between the United States and the Kingdom of Denmark, negotiated at NATO’s reques...
Denmark cannot practically or legitimately unilaterally "sell" Greenland as if it were estate property; Greenland is an autonomous territory with rights to self-determination and strong, repeated publ...
The short answer: no — the 1951 U.S.–Denmark defense agreement gives Washington sweeping operational rights in Greenland but does not lawlessly permit the United States to “set up whatever military pr...
Greenland’s place inside the Kingdom of Denmark and under NATO protection rests on layered domestic law, bilateral defence treaties and alliance arrangements rather than on a single document: Danish c...
A forced U.S. seizure of Greenland remains unlikely but not impossible in rhetorical terms: the White House has publicly said using the military is “always an option,” and President Trump has repeated...
Greenland’s political leadership has firmly rejected any notion of U.S. acquisition or unilateral takeover while accepting the logic of stronger allied defence on the island—preferably multilateral an...
Greenland is strategically important to U.S. and allied defense today — particularly because of U.S. early‑warning and radar facilities at Pituffik (formerly Thule) that help detect long‑range missile...
Pursuit of Greenland by the United States — whether through purchase, political pressure, or the threatened use of military force — would not immediately endanger existing U.S. facilities like Pituffi...
established and expanded military bases in through a combination of wartime bilateral arrangements, a formal 1951 defense treaty with that carved out "defense areas" and permissive jurisdictional rule...
The April 9, 1941 “Agreement Relating to the Defense of Greenland,” signed by Danish Ambassador Henrik Kauffmann and U.S. Secretary Cordell Hull, gave the United States broad wartime rights to defend ...
Denmark has not announced it will "cut all diplomatic connections" with the United States; instead Copenhagen has lodged repeated protests, summoned the U.S. ambassador, pushed for diplomatic resoluti...
The 6 August 2004 Igaliku update to the 1951 U.S.–Denmark Defense Agreement formally amended and supplemented the original treaty to recognize Greenland’s changed constitutional status and to add Gree...
The United States and NATO operate in Greenland under a Cold War–era defense pact with Denmark that grants the U.S. extensive basing and operating rights while formally recognizing Danish sovereignty,...
The 1951 U.S.–Denmark “Defense of Greenland” agreement authorizes U.S. forces to establish, operate and use designated “defense areas” in Greenland as part of NATO collective-defense planning, but it ...
President Trump and his White House team are actively discussing ways to acquire Greenland — ranging from a formal purchase or economic arrangements to explicitly keeping the U.S. military “always an ...
Greenland’s strategic importance to the United States is rooted in a Cold War-era security logic—its geography anchors early-warning, missile-defense and Arctic surveillance networks and sits astride ...
The short answer is: no — the claim that “Greenland is covered with Russian and Chinese ships all over the place” is an overstatement not supported by available reporting; there are indeed Russian and...