Your fact-checks will appear here
The US military action in Venezuela and its implications on international law and global politics.
The preponderance of legal commentary and international reactions cited in contemporary reporting conclude that military operation that captured and struck targets in likely violated core norms of int...
Venezuela’s options to defend itself from U.S. military, economic, or covert pressure combine legal, diplomatic, asymmetric military, economic-leverage, and domestic-control measures; each carries lim...
At least a dozen countries and several international bodies have publicly condemned recent U.S. military actions in Venezuela as an act of aggression; multiple sources list overlapping but not identic...
If the United States were to "claim" or exercise control over Venezuela, it would not automatically have a lawful or simple legal path to deport all Venezuelans from Venezuelan territory; internationa...
President Donald Trump ordered a dramatic U.S. military operation that captured Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro and signaled that the United States would “run” Venezuela, a move framed by his team as...
In 2006 the United States remained Venezuela’s single most important trading partner, importing large volumes of Venezuelan crude even as political relations soured under President Hugo Chávez’s refor...
The United States carried out a large-scale military operation against Venezuela on 3 January 2026 that included airstrikes across northern Venezuela and the capture and removal of President Nicolás M...
Il Brasile, guidato dal presidente Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, ha condannato con fermezza l'azione militare statunitense in Venezuela definendola una «gravissima offesa» alla sovranità nazionale e una ...