How do historians calculate the six million figure for Jewish victims of the Holocaust?

Checked on February 6, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Historians arrive at the widely cited figure of about six million Jewish victims by triangulating several independent lines of evidence—demographic accounting, Nazi records and camp transport/gassing data, and the postwar compilation of names and local records—which together place Jewish losses in Europe solidly between five and six million [1] [2] [3]. The “six million” functions as a rounded, evidence‑based working estimate endorsed by major institutions while scholarly estimates give a small range around it depending on method and sources [4] [5].

1. How historians count: three converging methods

The first method is demographic reconstruction: scholars compare prewar Jewish population totals with survivors, refugees and postwar Jewish population counts to estimate excess deaths; early scholarly estimates ranged from roughly 5.1 million to 5.95 million using variants of this method [1]. The second method rests on perpetrator documentation and camp accounting—transport lists, SS camp records, and killing‑center reports give granular death figures (for example, systematic tallies for the five major killing centers account for a substantial portion of the total) and enable per‑site totals to be compiled [2]. The third method is on‑the‑ground evidence: postwar registries, pages of testimony and name databases such as Yad Vashem’s collection of millions of names support and refine aggregate totals while archival finds and mass grave investigations corroborate the scale reported in documents [1] [3].

2. Concrete pieces of evidence that add up

Perpetrator documents such as the Korherr report and other Nazi statistics show very large Jewish losses by the end of 1942—Korherr’s accounting indicated Jewish losses of more than 2,454,000 by that date—while camp and killing‑center documentation and survivor testimony fill out later periods [6] [2]. Institutional tallies and compilations have been remarkably consistent: the Nuremberg Tribunal cited about 5,700,000 Jewish victims in 1945, large museums and research bodies continue to state roughly six million, and major historians produce overlapping ranges [5] [2] [4]. Yad Vashem’s ongoing Names Database has collected millions of victim names—on the order of 4.5–4.7 million accessible names—demonstrating both the scale and the incompleteness of surviving personal records [3] [1].

3. Why an exact headcount is unattainable and how that shapes estimates

There is no single wartime registry that lists every Jewish victim, many records were destroyed or never produced (especially for mass shootings and some occupied territories), and some official death‑registration documents undercount victims because they exclude those killed in extermination camps or mass graves, so historians necessarily work with incomplete datasets and well‑documented extrapolations [7] [3]. Different scholars weight sources differently—demographers, archival historians, and camp‑records specialists will produce slightly different totals—hence commonly cited ranges rather than a false single‑digit precision [1] [4].

4. How the six‑million figure became the accepted, responsible shorthand

Because multiple independent methods converged on roughly the same order of magnitude, wartime and immediate postwar bodies (including the Nuremberg Tribunal) and later research institutions adopted a rounded figure in the mid‑to‑high millions; over decades that rounded figure—about six million—became the working standard employed by museums and scholarship to communicate the scale while acknowledging a methodological range of about five to six million [5] [2] [4].

5. Misuses, myths and the importance of transparency

Some social and political actors seize on the inevitable uncertainty to deny or relativize the genocide, while archival clarifications show how documents are sometimes misread (the Arolsen Archives and other institutions explicitly debunk misuse of partial death‑certificate lists that omit extermination camp victims) and caution against false precision or invented figures such as the oft‑repeated “5 million others” addition that lacks the same evidentiary basis [7] [8]. Responsible historical practice is to report the best evidence, explain methods and margins of uncertainty, and preserve both the individual names collected and the aggregated totals that memorialize scale [1] [2].

6. Bottom line

Historians calculate the six million figure not from a single ledger but from the convergence of demographic reconstructions, Nazi statistical and operational records, camp and killing‑center documentation, and millions of name records; together these independent streams place Jewish deaths in the Holocaust firmly in the five‑to‑six‑million range, with “six million” serving as the rounded, widely used estimate in public discourse and scholarship [1] [2] [3].

Want to dive deeper?
What are the main demographic methods historians use to estimate victim numbers in genocides?
How do the Korherr report and other Nazi documents contribute to Holocaust victim estimates?
What is Yad Vashem’s Names Database and how complete is it?