Martin Luther wrote about the Jews and their lies.
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Martin Luther authored a virulently anti-Jewish tract titled On the Jews and Their Lies in 1543 that demonized Jews, urged severe measures against them, and recommended actions including burning synagogues and confiscating property [1] [2]. Scholars and institutions have long treated this pamphlet as a pivotal and toxic moment in Christian anti‑Jewish rhetoric, with critics arguing it fed later anti‑Jewish movements and defenders pointing to a more complex arc in Luther’s attitudes over his life [1] [3] [4].
1. The pamphlet and its prescriptions: what Luther actually wrote
On the Jews and Their Lies is a 1543 polemic in which Luther inveighs against "the Jews," accuses them of lying and blasphemy, and explicitly urges rulers and Christians to take harsh, even violent measures — including burning synagogues and schools, destroying prayer books, forbidding rabbis to preach, razing Jewish homes, and confiscating money and property — language that reads as a call for state‑sanctioned persecution [1] [2] [5].
2. Tone and rhetoric: demonization and dehumanization
The text deploys blistering, dehumanizing language — calling Jews “miserable and accursed,” likening Jewish hearts to iron or devilry, and urging authorities to act “like a good physician” cutting away gangrenous flesh — rhetoric scholars describe as deliberate demonization designed to mobilize Christians and political authorities against Jewish communities [2] [5] [6].
3. Luther’s earlier stance and the trajectory of his views
Luther did not begin his career with the same tone: earlier writings and letters from the 1510s show an openness to Jewish concerns and even sympathetic phrases about Jews being “blood‑relations of our Lord,” and an initial hope they might convert to Protestantism; by the 1540s, frustration at failed missionary aims and other factors produced the vitriolic pamphlet [7] [8] [9].
4. Historians on legacy: influence and appropriation
Many historians and commentators link Luther’s 1543 polemics to later anti‑Jewish currents in Germany; scholars note that Nazi propagandists and clergy repeatedly quoted Luther and that his writings were invoked during Kristallnacht and in Nazi publications, leading some historians to call the pamphlet a blueprint or inspirational source for modern antisemitism in Germany [3] [10].
5. Institutional reckonings and condemnations
Post‑Holocaust Lutheran bodies and scholars have acknowledged the gravity of Luther’s anti‑Jewish writings: church synods and statements have urged taking his anti‑Jewish utterances seriously, reflecting and repudiating their theological function and consequences in subsequent history [1] [3].
6. Scholarly interpretation and contested readings
Scholars debate how to weigh theological context, rhetorical strategy, and historical consequences: some situate Luther’s rhetoric within medieval Christian anti‑Jewish polemic traditions and his own theological anxieties of the 1540s, while others stress that contextualization does not exonerate the explicit calls for violence and suppression found in the pamphlet [6] [4] [11].
7. The moral and historical verdict
Across the sources, the plain content of On the Jews and Their Lies is undeniable: it contains explicit prescriptions for persecuting Jews and dehumanizing rhetoric that later actors exploited; institutions and historians have treated it as an “abominable” milestone in Christian anti‑Judaism and a legacy requiring formal repudiation [1] [12] [10].
8. Where reporting and scholarship diverge and what remains unsettled
While there is consensus that Luther’s 1543 tract is anti‑Jewish and dangerous, debates continue over causal weight — how directly Luther’s words produced later atrocities versus how readily later antisemitic movements opportunistically drew on them — and some defenders emphasize his earlier sympathetic writings even as critics point to the unequivocal violence of the later text [3] [9] [13].