Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Who is the developer that funds and maintains factually.com?
Executive Summary
The clearest, directly supported claim is that the App Store listing for the Factually mobile app identifies TEODOR KRASIMIROV SAVOV as the developer, which implies he funds or maintains the app and related service [1]. Other analyses and review pages show no clear or consistent public record tying ownership of factually.com (or factually.co) to an organization, and some pieces state the project relies on donations and emphasizes independence, leaving room for ambiguity about who funds the wider website [2] [3].
1. The App Store name that changes the record — a tangible developer listing that matters
The App Store entry for the Factually app names TEODOR KRASIMIROV SAVOV as the developer, which is a concrete, recent platform-level declaration and therefore strong evidence that an individual by that name is responsible for the app’s publication and associated maintenance duties [1]. Platform registries like Apple’s developer metadata are authoritative for app ownership at the time of listing because they require account-level identification to publish. This source offers a direct attribution that other public write-ups in the collection do not; the App Store listing is dated June 17, 2025 in the provided analysis and therefore is the most specific, verifiable data point available [1]. The presence of an individual developer name on that listing contrasts with other descriptions that characterize the project as donor-funded or anonymous.
2. Confusion between factually.com and factually.co — domain mixups obscure ownership
Multiple analyses highlight that reporting often conflates factually.com with factually.co and related labels, and the result is significant information gaps about ownership structures and funding [4] [3]. Independent reviews and fact-check rundowns repeatedly find “no information” on the entity behind the site, or treat the site as a community donation-funded initiative without naming a developer [3] [4]. This inconsistency matters because app store metadata can reference a product name or domain that differs from the primary website people query; when sources discuss donations or independence they may be addressing a broader service identity rather than the technical owner named in a developer account [2].
3. Review sites and skepticism — alternative narratives and potential agendas
Review and aggregation pages describe Factually in terms ranging from a donor-supported independent project to a generic review target in scam-watch lists, but these pieces rarely cite primary records linking funding or maintenance to a legal entity [5] [2]. Such sites can have an agenda — namely attracting traffic with alarmist “scam or legit” framing — which can skew public perception and leave the concrete ownership question unresolved [5]. The absence of corroborating documentation in those write-ups contrasts with the App Store’s explicit developer entry, leaving the App Store metadata as the strongest single attribution amid less rigorous secondary commentary [1] [5].
4. Reconciling the evidence — what is well-supported and what remains uncertain
Taken together, the evidence supports a clear, narrow conclusion: the Factually app’s publisher is listed as TEODOR KRASIMIROV SAVOV on Apple’s App Store, which reasonably indicates he funds or maintains that app presence [1]. At the same time, public-facing explanations about a donation-funded, independent Factually project are reported elsewhere without naming a developer, which leaves open the possibility that the website and broader project may involve community funding or separate organizational arrangements not captured in the App Store metadata [2] [3]. The divergent threads mean that while the App Store gives a named developer, broader site funding and operational structure remain incompletely documented in the sampled sources.
5. Practical next steps and accountability checks the public can use
To finalize attribution beyond the App Store listing — which is the strongest single data point here — users should consult primary registries and official disclosures such as the site’s own “About” page, domain WHOIS records, and corporate filings; the present evidence set does not include those records, so definitive confirmation of website funding and maintenance beyond the app publisher cannot be established from the sampled materials alone [1] [4]. Given the mix of platform-level attribution and ambiguous secondary reporting, the most defensible statement is that the app developer is TEODOR KRASIMIROV SAVOV, while broader claims about factually.com’s funding should be treated as unresolved until primary ownership or financial disclosures are located [1] [2].