Index/Organizations/United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

US Court

Fact-Checks

34 results
Jan 13, 2026
Most Viewed

How have federal courts interpreted 18 U.S.C. § 111 in protest and civil‑disobedience cases?

Federal courts and prosecutors treat 18 U.S.C. § 111 as a flexible tool to protect federal officers’ ability to perform official duties, applying it to a wide range of conduct from physical blows to o...

Jan 26, 2026
Most Viewed

What cases have federal courts decided about the right to record federal agents and how did they rule?

Federal appellate courts have repeatedly recognized a right to record law-enforcement officers performing their public duties, but the doctrine has been shaped by a patchwork of decisions that allow r...

Jan 24, 2026
Most Viewed

How are courts treating AI‑generated or indistinguishable synthetic CSAM under current federal and state laws?

Federal courts and lawmakers are wrestling with (CSAM): prosecutors treat such material as criminal under existing federal statutes in many cases, but constitutional limits from and recent district-co...

Jan 27, 2026

What are the all-party consent states for audio recording and how do they affect filming ICE?

All-party (often called “two-party”) consent states require that every participant in a private conversation agree before audio can be recorded; most states, and federal law follow one‑party consent, ...

Dec 10, 2025

Have any court cases challenged arrests based on AI system reports of CSAM?

Federal prosecutors have charged people for creating, distributing, or possessing AI-generated CSAM, and at least one defendant successfully won dismissal of a possession count on First Amendment grou...

Jan 14, 2026

What are notable recent appellate decisions interpreting threats and menacing conduct under §111?

Federal appellate courts are actively divided over whether 18 U.S.C. § 111 requires “assaultive” conduct (including threatening or menacing conduct that creates an apprehension of harm) as an element ...

Jan 12, 2026

How have federal appeals courts ruled on whether streamed CSAM without saved files counts as possession?

Federal appeals courts have not produced a uniform, definitive rule that streaming child sexual abuse material (CSAM) without saving a file always constitutes “possession”; lower courts and commentato...

Dec 12, 2025

Which Supreme Court or federal appeals rulings shaped Obama-era prosecutorial discretion on immigration enforcement?

Key Supreme Court and federal appeals rulings that conditioned Obama‑era prosecutorial discretion in immigration include the Supreme Court’s intervention in challenges to Obama’s Deferred Action initi...

Dec 10, 2025

How have courts ruled on fraud, malpractice, or false-advertising claims against Dr Eric Berg?

Courts and regulators have produced a mixed record: a Virginia licensing action resulted in a formal reprimand and monetary penalty against Eric Berg, D.C., based on unsupported therapeutic claims (Qu...

Jan 18, 2026

How did different circuits apply the ‘moment-of-threat’ rule before the Supreme Court’s decision?

Federal courts were sharply divided before the Supreme Court’s ruling: a minority of circuits—most notably the Fifth, along with the Second, Fourth, and Eighth in practice—applied a compressed “moment...

Jan 16, 2026

What is the Supreme Court’s recent jurisprudence on the president’s Article II authority to deploy troops domestically?

The Supreme Court’s recent interventions have constrained the president’s Article II claim to deploy military forces domestically, signaling that such deployments are “exceptional,” subject to statuto...

Nov 22, 2025

Have courts found ICE liable for unlawful detentions, excessive force, or due process violations?

Federal courts over the past year have repeatedly found that ICE actions ran afoul of legal limits — judges have ordered releases for detainees after finding unlawful arrests or due-process failures (...

Feb 5, 2026

How have federal courts construed “forcibly” and “assault” under 18 U.S.C. §111 in the last five years?

Federal courts in the last five years have fractured on whether C. § 111 requires “assault” as an essential element and how broadly the adjective “forcibly” reaches non‑contact conduct; some courts an...

Feb 5, 2026

How have federal circuit courts differed on whether a single utterance of the N‑word creates a hostile work environment under Title VII?

Federal appellate courts are split: several circuits have held that a single, egregious utterance of the N‑word can be enough to send a Title VII claim to a jury, while others treat a lone slur as a n...

Feb 5, 2026

What happens when the Castro Nova immigration consent decree expires on 2 Feb 2026?

The — a 2022 court agreement restricting warrantless and collateral arrests in the — was extended by through February 2, 2026, and the court ordered continued reporting, reissuance of a broadcast poli...

Feb 5, 2026

Which federal appellate decisions since 2022 have most shaped Fourth Amendment limits on ICE warrantless arrests?

Since 2022, two lines of appellate and high‑profile federal rulings have most reshaped on ICE’s warrantless arrests: in that scrutinized and probable‑cause safeguards , and that narrowed district‑cour...

Feb 5, 2026

How have courts treated AI-generated imagery in CSAM prosecutions when no real child was involved?

Courts have treated as legally fraught: longstanding Supreme Court protections for “virtual” depictions mean synthetic images that do not involve real children can be constitutionally protected speech...

Feb 4, 2026

What did the Supreme Court decide in Stands Alone (21‑6826) regarding § 111 and the common‑law assault element?

The materials provided do not include a Supreme Court opinion resolving ; instead they show the petition for certiorari, briefing by amici, and ruling that § 111 does not require the common‑law offens...

Feb 3, 2026

How have federal courts divided on whether common‑law simple assault is an element of 18 U.S.C. §111?

Federal courts are sharply split over whether common‑law simple assault is an element of : some circuits treat § 111 convictions as requiring at least some form of assaultive conduct, while others all...

Jan 31, 2026

What was the final court decision in Eric Berg’s disability-insurance appeal against New York Life/Unum?

The reversed the district court’s grant of summary judgment to and and remanded the case for further proceedings, concluding the “requires and receives regular care by a Physician” does not include th...