What acts has Trump accomplished
Donald J. Trump’s recent and prior administrations put forward a long list of claimed accomplishments spanning executive actions, economic metrics, trade and energy moves, and high-profile appointment...
Your fact-checks will appear here
U.S. Supreme Court justice since 2018 (born 1965)
Donald J. Trump’s recent and prior administrations put forward a long list of claimed accomplishments spanning executive actions, economic metrics, trade and energy moves, and high-profile appointment...
Available reporting in the provided dossier does not show evidence that Jeffrey Epstein took steps to ensure Brett Kavanaugh’s appointment to the Supreme Court; the sources focus on the 2018 confirmat...
The most consequential recent Supreme Court action affecting through November 2025 was the court’s September 2025 order staying a district judge’s injunction that had limited ICE’s ability to stop and...
President Donald J. Trump, across his time in office and into his second term through December 9, 2025, had 260 Article III federal judges confirmed — including three Supreme Court associate justices ...
’s first term (2017–2021) produced a mix of durable institutional changes—most notably sweeping judicial appointments and a major tax overhaul—alongside aggressive , energy-policy shifts, and high-pro...
Three current U.S. Supreme Court justices—Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett—were appointed by President Donald Trump, a shift that transformed the Court’s center of gravity and helpe...
The supplied materials identify a string of high-profile violent incidents and threats tied by observers or perpetrators to , including the Scalise shooting, pipe bombs in 2018, the Whitmer kidnapping...
Available reporting in the provided results shows no direct documentation that Brett Kavanaugh had in-person meetings or social contacts with Jeffrey Epstein; however, newly released emails from Epste...
Christine Blasey Ford alleges Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her as teenagers in 1982; she testified publicly in 2018 and has revisited that testimony in a 2024 memoir, describing lasting trauma a...
Senate Judiciary Committee documents and public reporting show that senators and investigators raised serious questions about how the FBI handled tips and the scope of its supplemental background chec...
Courts have historically given presidents broad deference to decide when domestic military force is needed, a posture rooted in the 1827 Martin v. Mott precedent that the authority to call out the mil...
Christine Blasey Ford first publicly identified herself in an on-the-record interview with The Washington Post published September 16–17, 2018, saying she felt a “civic responsibility” to speak about ...
Bob Woodward is on record denying Republican claims that he told Rep. James Comer that President Biden was “financially corrupt,” and The Washington Post has been the outlet where Woodward works and w...
Donald Trump’s first term produced a large, well-documented reshaping of the federal bench: 234 Article III judges were confirmed from 2017–2021, including three Supreme Court justices and 54 appellat...
may question people in public without a warrant, but more intrusive actions on the street — a temporary detention or an arrest — require legal thresholds: a brief detention (a “stop”) needs reasonable...
The Supreme Court’s September 8, 2025 order stayed a federal judge’s restraining order that had limited ICE “roving” stops in Los Angeles, and the majority signaled that the Constitution likely permit...
have, in 2025–2026, tended to constrain ’s most aggressive warrantless-arrest and entry tactics: a federal judge issued a broad ruling curbing warrantless arrests and a court extended a consent decree...
Federal trial courts in Los Angeles barred ICE and DHS from stopping, questioning or detaining people based solely on broad, demographic factors—such as perceived race or ethnicity, the language a per...
Donald Trump’s judicial appointments substantially increased the share of Republican-appointed judges on the federal bench—most markedly on the courts of appeals—while producing only more modest shift...
The reporting and opinions show this was not a 7–2 decision but a sharply divided 6–3 Supreme Court ruling that recognized substantial presidential immunity from criminal prosecution for some official...